imitation and the geographic pat-
terning of suicide. American Socio-
logical Review,873–888.
Banaka, William H. (1971). Training in
depth interviewing. New York:
Harper & Row.
Bannister, Robert C. (1987). Sociology
and scientism: The American quest for
objectivity, 1880–1940.Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press.
Baranik, Lisa E. et al. (2008). Examining
the differential item functioning of the
Rosenberg self-esteem scale across
eight countries. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology,38(7):1867–1904.
Barber, Jennifer S., and William G.
Axinn. (1998). Gender attitudes and
marriage among young women.
Sociological Quarterly,39:11–31.
Barlow, Melissa Hickman, David E. Bar-
low, and Theodore G. Chiricos.
(1995). Economic conditions and
ideologies of crime in the media: A
content analysis of crime news.
Crime and Delinquency,41:3–19.
Barnes, Barry. (1974). Scientific knowl-
edge and sociological theory.
Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Barnes, J. A. (1970). Some ethical prob-
lems in modern fieldwork. In
Qualitative methodology,edited by
W. J. Filstead, pp. 235–251. Chicago:
Markham.
Barnes, J. A. (1979). Who should know
what? Social science, privacy and
ethics.New York: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Barry, Brian. (1975). On analogy.
Political Studies,23:208–224.
Bart, Pauline. (1987). Seizing the means
of reproduction: An illegal feminist
abortion collective—How and why it
worked. Qualitative Sociology,
10:339–357.
Bart, Pauline, and Linda Frankel. (1986).
The student sociologist’s handbook,
4th ed. New York: Random House.
Bartiz, Loren. (1960). Servants of power:
A history of the use of social science
in American industry.Middletown,
CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Barton, Allen H. (1995). Asking why
about social problems: Ideology and
causal models in the public mind.
International Journal of Public
Opinion Research,7:299–327.
Barzun, Jacques, and Henry F. Graff.
(1970). The modern researcher,rev.
ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and
World.
Bateson, Nicholas. (1984). Data con-
struction in social surveys.Boston:
George Allen and Unwin.
Bauer, David G. (1988). The “how to”
grants manual,2nd ed. New York:
Macmillan.
Bauer, Raymond, ed. (1966). Social indi-
cators.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bausell, R. Barker. (1994). Conducting
meaningful experiments: Forty steps
to becoming a scientist.Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bayless, David L. (1981). Twenty-two
years of survey research at the Re-
search Triangle: 1959–1980. In
Current topics in survey sampling,
edited by D. Krewski, R. Platek, and
J. N. K. Rao, pp. 87–103. New York:
Academic Press.
Beasley, David. (1988). How to use a re-
search library.New York: Oxford
University Press.
Beatty, Paul. (1995). Understanding the
standardization/non-standardization
controversy. Journal of Official Sta-
tistics,11:147–160.
Beck, Bernard. (1970). Cooking welfare
stew. In Pathways to data,edited by
R. W. Habenstein, pp. 7–29. Chicago:
Aldine.
Becker, Henk A., and Frank Vanclay.
(2003). The international handbook
of social impact assessment: Con-
ceptual and methodological ad-
vances. Northampton, MA: Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Becker, Howard. (1967). Whose side are
we on? Social Problems,14:239–247.
Becker, Howard S. (1969). Problems in
the publication of field studies. In
Issues in participant observation,
edited by G. McCall and J. L. Sim-
mons, pp. 260–275. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Becker, Howard S. (1970a). Practitioners
of vice and crime. In Pathways to
data,edited by R. W. Habenstein,
pp. 30–49. Chicago: Aldine.
Becker, Howard S. (1970b). Problems of
inference and proof in participant ob-
servation. In Qualitative methodology:
Firsthand involvement with the social
world,edited by W. J. Filstead,
pp. 189–201. Chicago: Markham.
Becker, Howard S. (1970c). Whose side
are we on? In Qualitative metho-
dology,edited by W. J. Filstead,
pp. 15–26. Chicago: Markham.
Becker, Howard S. (1986). Writing for so-
cial scientists: How to start and finish
your thesis, book or article.Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S. (1993). How I
learned what a crock was. Journal
of Contemporary Ethnography,
22:28–35.Becker, Howard S. (1998). Tricks of
the trade: How to think about your
research while you’re doing it.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S., and Blanche Geer.
(1970). Participant observation and
interviewing: A comparison. In
Qualitative methodology,edited by
W. J. Filstead, pp. 133–142. Chicago:
Markham.
Becker, Howard S., and Blanche Geer.
(1982). Participant observation: The
analysis of qualitative field data. In
Field research: A sourcebook and
field manual,edited by R. G. Burgess,
pp. 239–250. Boston: George Allen
and Unwin.
Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, Everett
C. Hughes, and Anselm Strauss.
(1961). Boys in white: Student culture
in medical school.Chicago: Univer-
sity of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S., Michal M. McCall,
and Lori V. Morris. (1989). Theatres
and communities: Three scenes.
Social Problems,36:93–116.
Beecher, H. K. (1970). Research and the
individual: Human studies.Boston:
Little, Brown.
Behm-Morawitz, Elizabeth, and Dana E.
Mastro. (2008). Mean girls? The in-
fluence of gender portrayals in teen
movies on emerging adults’ gender-
based attitudes and beliefs. Journalism
and Mass Communication Quarterly,
85(1):131–146.
Belenky, Mary Field, Blythe McVicker
Clinchy, Nancy Rule Goldberger, and
Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1986). Women’s
ways of knowing: The development of
self, voice and mind.New York:
Basic Books.
Bellah, Robert N. (1957). Tokugawa reli-
gion.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Belli, Robert F., et al. (1999). Reducing
vote overreporting in surveys: Social
desirability, memory failure and
source monitoring. Public Opinion
Quarterly,63:90–108.
Ben-David, Joseph. (1971). The scien-
tist’s role in society.Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. (1983). History,
selection and randomness—Towards
an analysis of social historical expla-
nations. Quality and Quantity,17:
347–367.
Bendix, Reinhard. (1956). Work and au-
thority in industry.New York: Wiley.
Bendix, Reinhard. (1963). Concepts and
generalizations in comparative soci-
ological studies. American Sociolog-
ical Review,28:91–116.BIBLIOGRAPHY