Harding, Sandra. (1986). The science
question in feminism.Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Hargens, Lowell L. (1988). Scholarly
consensus and journal rejection rates.
American Sociological Review,
53:139–151.
Hargens, Lowell L. (1991). Impressions
and misimpressions about sociology
journals. Contemporary Sociology,
20:343–349.
Harkens, Shirley, and Carol Warren.
(1993). The social relations of inten-
sive interviewing: Constellations
of strangeness and science.
Sociological Methods and Research,
21:317–339.
Harkness, Janet. (2003). Questionnaire
in translation. In Cross-cultural sur-
vey methods,edited by J. Harkness,
F. Van de Vijver, and P. Mohler,
pp. 35–56. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Harkness, Janet, Beth-Ellen Pennell,
and Alisu Schoua-Glusberg. (2003).
Survey questionnaire translation and
assessment. In Methods for testing
and evaluating survey question-
naires,edited by S. Presser et al.,
pp. 453–473. New York: Wiley.
Harkness, Janet, Fons van de Vijver, and
Timothy Johnson. (2003). Question-
naire design in comparative research.
In Cross-cultural survey methods,
edited by J. Harkness, F. Van de
Vijver, and P. Mohler, pp. 19–34.
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Harper, Douglas. (1982). Good company.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harper, Douglas. (1987). Working knowl-
edge.Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Harper, Douglas. (1994). On the author-
ity of the image: Visual methods at
the crossroads. In Handbook of qual-
itative research,edited by N. Denzin
and Y. Lincoln, pp. 403–412. Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harré, Rom. (1972). The philosophies of
science.London: Oxford University
Press.
Harré, R., and P. F. Secord. (1979). The
explanation of social behavior.
Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
Harrington, Brooke. (2003). The social
psychology of access in ethnographic
research. Journal of Contemporary
Ethnography,32:592–625.
Harris, Benjamin. (1988). Key words: A
history of debriefing in social psy-
chology. In The rise of experimenta-
tion in American psychology,edited
by J. Morawski, pp. 188–212. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Harris, Marvin. (1976). History and sig-
nificance of the emic/etic distinction.
Annual Review of Anthropology,
5:329–350.
Harris Poll. (2003). Religious and
other beliefs of Americans, 2003.
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/
vault/Harris-Interactive-Poll-
Research-Religious-and-other-
Beliefs-of-Americans-2003.pdf
Harris Poll. (2008). More Americans be-
lieve in the devil, hell, and angels
than in Darwin’s evolution. http://
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/
Harris-Interactive-Poll-Research-
Religious-Beliefs-2008.pdf
Harvey, Lee. (1990). Critical social re-
search.London: Unwin Hyman.
Harwood, Jake. (2000). Sharp! Lurking
incoherence in a television portrayal
of an older adult. Journal of Lan-
guage and Social Psychology,19(1):
110–140.
Hastings, Philip K., and Dean R. Hodge.
(1986). Religious and moral attitude
trends among college students,
1948–84. Social Forces,65:370–377.
Hauck, Matthew, and Michael Cox.
(1974). Locating a sample by random
digit dialing: Some hypotheses and a
random sample. Public Opinion
Quarterly,38:253–260.
Hayano, David M. (1982). Poker faces:
The life and work of professional
card players.Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Haydu, Jeffrey. (1998). Making use of
the past: Time periods as cases to
compare and as sequences of prob-
lem solving. American Journal of So-
ciology,104:339–371.
Hayes, Andrew F., and Klaus Krippen-
dorff. (2007). Answering the call for
a standard reliability measure for cod-
ing data. Communication Methods
and Measures,1(1):77–89.
Hazelrigg, Lawrence E. (1973). Aspects
of the measurement of class con-
sciousness. In Comparative social re-
search,edited by M. Armer and A. D.
Grimshaw, pp. 219–246. New York:
Wiley.
Headland, Thomas, Kenneth Pike, and
Marvin Harris, eds. (1990). Emics
and etics: The insider/outsider de-
bate.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hearnshaw, L. S. (1979). Cyril Burt:
Psychologist.London: Holder and
Stoughten.
Heberlein, Thomas A., and Robert
Baumgartner. (1978). Factors affect-
ing response rates to mailed ques-
tionnaires: A quantitative analysis ofthe published literature. American
Sociological Review,43:447–462.
Heberlein, Thomas A., and Robert
Baumgartner. (1981). Is a question-
naire necessary in a second mailing?
Public Opinion Quarterly, 45:
102–107.
Heckathorn, Douglas D. (1997).
Respondent-driven sampling: A new
approach to the study of hidden pop-
ulations. Social Problems, 44:
174–199.
Heckathorn, Douglas D. (2002).
Respondent-driven sampling II:
Deriving valid population estimates
from chain-referral samples of hid-
den populations. Social Problems,
49:11–35.
Hector, Michael. (1975). Internal colo-
nialism.Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Hedstrom, Peter, and Richard Swedberg.
(1998). Social mechanisms: An in-
troductory essay. In Social mecha-
nisms: An analytical approach to
social theory,edited by P. Hedstrom
and R. Swedberg, pp. 1–31. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Hegtvedt, Karen A. (1992). Replication.
In Encyclopedia of sociology,Vol. 3,
edited by E. and M. Borgatta,
pp. 1661–1663. New York: Mac-
millan.
Hegtvedt, Karen A. (2007). Ethics and
experiments. In Laboratory experi-
ments in the social sciences,edited
by Murray Webster, Jr. and Jane Sell,
pp. 141–172 New York: Academic
Press.
Heise, David. (1965). Semantic differen-
tial profiles for 1,000 most frequent
English words. Psychological Mono-
graphs,70 No. (8).
Heise, David. (1970). The semantic
differential and attitude research. In
Attitude measurement,edited by
G. Summers, pp. 235–253. Chicago:
Rand McNally.
Heise, David. (1974). Some issues in soci-
ological measurement. In Sociological
methodology, 1973–74,edited by H. L.
Costner, pp. 1–16. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Heise, David, ed. (1981). Microcomputers
in social research.Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
Heise, David. (1991). Event structure
analysis. In Using computers in qual-
itative research,edited by N. Field-
ing and R. Lee, pp. 136–163.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Held, David. (1980). Introduction to criti-
cal theory: Horkheimer to Habermas.BIBLIOGRAPHY