Mendenhall, William, Lyman Ott, and
Richard L. Scheaffer. (1971).
Elementary survey sampling.Bel-
mont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Merten, Don E. (1999). Enculturation
into secrecy among junior high
school girls. Journal of Contempo-
rary Ethnography,28:107–138.
Merton, Robert K. (1938). Social struc-
ture and anomie. American Socio-
logical Review3(5):672–682.
Merton, Robert K. (1957). Social theory
and social structure.New York: Free
Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1967). On theoreti-
cal sociology: Five essays, old and
new.New York: Free Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1970). Science, tech-
nology and society in seventeenth cen-
tury England.New York: Harper &
Row.
Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology
of science.Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Meyer, Katrina A. (1998). Faculty work-
load studies: Perspectives, needs, and
future directions. ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report, Vol. 26, No. 1.
Washington, DC: Office of Educa-
tional Research and Improvement.
Mihic, Sophia, Stephen Engelmann, and
Elizabeth Rose Wingrove. (2005).
Making sense in and of political sci-
ence: Facts, values and “real” num-
bers. In The politics of method in the
human sciences: Positivism and its
epistemological others,edited by
George Steinmetz, pp. 470–495.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mikkelsen, Britha. (1995). Methods for
development work and research: A
guide for practitioners.Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milem, Jeffrey F., Joseph Berger, and
Eric Dey. (2000). Faculty time allo-
cation: A study of change over
twenty years. Journal of Higher Ed-
ucation,71:454–475.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Hu-
berman. (1994). Qualitative data
analysis,2nd ed. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Milgram, Stanley. (1963). Behavioral
study of obedience. Journal of Ab-
normal and Social Psychology,
6:371–378.
Milgram, Stanley. (1965). Some condi-
tions of obedience and disobedience
to authority. Human Relations,
18:57–76.
Milgram, Stanley. (1974). Obedience to
authority.New York: Harper & Row.
Miller, Brian K., and Steve Werner.
(2007). Predictors of helping behav-
ior toward coworkers with disabili-
ties. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology,37(11):2660–2687.
Miller, Delbert C. (1991). Handbook of
research design and social measure-
ment,5th ed. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Miller, Gale. (1992). Case studies. In
Encyclopedia of sociology,Vol. 1, ed-
ited by Edgar and Marie Borgatta, pp.
167–172. New York: Macmillan.
Miller, John D. (1998). The measurement
of civic scientific literacy. Public
Understanding of Science 7(3):
203–223.
Miller, John D., Eugenie C. Scott, and
Shinji Okamoto. (2006). Public ac-
ceptance of evolution. Science 313
(5788):765–766 (August 11 2006).
Miller, J. Mitchell, and Richard Tewks-
bury, eds. (2000). Extreme methods:
Innovative approaches to social sci-
ence research.New York: Addison
Wesley, Longman.
Miller, Richard. (1987). Fact and
method: Explanation, confirmation
and reality in the natural and social
sciences.Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Miller, William L. (1983). The survey
method in the social and political sci-
ences: Achievements, failures and
prospects.London: Frances Pinter.
Milligan, John D. (1979). The treatment
of historical source. History and The-
ory,18:177–196.
Mills, C. Wright. (1959). The sociologi-
cal imagination.New York: Oxford
University Press.
Miringoff, Marque-Luisa, and Sandra
Opdycke. (2007). America’s social
health: Putting social issues back on
the public agenda. New York. M.E.
Sharpe.
Mishler, Elliot G. (1986). Research in-
terviewing: Context and narrative.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Mitchell, Alison. (May 17, 1997). Sur-
vivors of Tuskegee study get apology
from Clinton. New York Times.
Mitchell, J. Clyde. (1984). Case studies.
In Ethnographic research: A guide to
general conduct,edited by R. F.
Ellen, pp. 237–241. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
Mitchell, Mark, and Janina Jolley.
(1988). Research design explained.
New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston.Mitchell, Richard G., Jr. (1993). Secrecy
and fieldwork.Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Mitroff, Ian. (1974). Norms and counter-
norms in a select group of the Apollo
moon scientists: A case study of
ambivalence of scientists. American
Sociology Review,39:579–595.
Molotch, Harvey, William Freudenburg,
and Krista Paulsen. (2000). History
repeats itself, but how? City charac-
ter, urban tradition, and the accom-
plishment of place. American
Sociological Review,65:791–823.
Monaghan, Peter. (April 7, 1993a). Fac-
ing jail, a sociologist raises question
about a scholar’s right to protect
sources. Chronicle of Higher Educa-
tion,p. A10.
Monaghan, Peter. (May 26, 1993b).
Sociologist is jailed for refusing to
testify about research subject.
Chronicle of Higher Education,
p. A10.
Monaghan, Peter. (September 1, 1993c).
Sociologist jailed because he
“wouldn’t snitch” ponders the way
research ought to be done. Chronicle
of Higher Education,pp. A8–A9.
Monmonier, Mark. (1996). How to lie
with maps,2nd ed. Chicago: Univer-
sity of Chicago Press.
Montemurro, Beth. (2005). Add men,
don’t stir: Reproducing traditional
gender roles in modern wedding
showers. Journal of Contemporary
Ethnography,34(1):6–35.
Mook, Douglas G. (1983). In defense of
external invalidity. American Psy-
chologist,38:379–387.
Mooney, Chris. (2005). The Republican
war on science. New York: Basic
Books.
Moore, Barrington, Jr. (1966). The social
origins of dictatorship and democ-
racy.Boston: Beacon Press.
Moore, Joan. (1973). Social constraints
on sociological knowledge: Aca-
demic and research concerning mi-
norities. Social Problems,21:65–77.
Moore, R. J. (2004). Managing troubles
in answering survey questions:
Respondents’ uses of projective
reporting. Social Psychology Quar-
terly,67:50–69.
Moors, Guy. (2008). Exploring the effect
of a middle response category on re-
sponse style in attitude measurement.
Quality and Quantity,42:779–794.
Morgan, David L. (1996). Focus groups.
Annual Review of Sociology,22:
129–152.BIBLIOGRAPHY