Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches

(Brent) #1
BIBLIOGRAPHY

traffickers. Trends in Organized
Crime11(1):30–41.
Trussell, Norm, and Paul Lavrakas.
(2004). The influence of incremental
increases in token cash. Public
Opinion Quarterly,68:368–393.
Tuchman, Gaye. (1994). Historical social
science: Methodologies, methods
and meanings. In Handbook of qual-
itative research,edited by N. Denzin
and Y. Lincoln, pp. 306–323. Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tucker, Clyde. (1983). Interviewer effects
in telephone interviewing. Public
Opinion Quarterly,47:84–95.
Tufte, Edward. (1983). The visual display
of quantitative information.Cheshire,
CT: Graphics Press.
Tufte, Edward. (1991). Envisioning in-
formation,rev. ed. Cheshire, CT:
Graphics Press.
Tuma, Nancy B., and Andrew Grimes.
(1981). A comparison of models
of role orientations of professionals
in a research oriented university.
Administrative Science Quarterly,
21:187–206.
Turner, Charles. (1984). Why do sur-
veys disagree? Some preliminary
hypotheses and some disagree-
able examples. In Surveying sub-
jective phenomena,Vol. 2, edited
byC. Turner and E. Martin,
pp. 157–214. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation.
Turner, Charles, and Elizabeth Martin,
eds. (1984). Surveying subjective phe-
nomena,Vol. 1. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1985). In defense of
positivism. Sociological Theory,
3:24–30.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1992). Positivism.
In Encylopedia of sociology,Vol. 3,
edited by E. and M. Borgatta, pp.
1509–1512. New York: Macmillan.
Turner, Roy. (1974). Ethnomethodology.
Middlesex: Penguin.
Turner, Stephen P. (1980). Sociological
explanation as translation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Stephen P. (1991). The world of
academic quantifiers: The Columbia
University family and its connec-
tions. In The social survey in histori-
cal perspective, 1880–1940,edited
by M. Blumer, K. Bales, and K.
Sklar, pp. 269–290. New York: Cam-
bridge University Press.
Turner, Stephen Park, and Jonathan H.
Turner. (1991). The impossible sci-
ence: An institutional analysis of


American sociology.Newbury Park,
CA: Sage.
Uecker, Jeremy E., Mark D. Regnerus,
and Margaret L. Vaaler. (2007). Los-
ing my religion: The social sources of
religious decline in early adulthood.
Social Forces,85(4):1667–1692.
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2004).
Scientific integrity in policy making.
Cambridge MA: Union of Con-
cerned Scientists.
United States Census Bureau. (2008).
Linguistic isolation. American Com-
munity Survey data 2007, Fact Finder,
Table 1602. http://factfinder.census
.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-qr_
name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_S160
2&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=
ACS_2007_3YR_G00_&-_lang=en.
Accessed July 30, 2010.
Unnever, James, and Francis T. Cullen.
(2007). The racial divide in support
for the death penalty: Does white
racism matter? Social Forces
85(3):1281–1301.
Useem, Michael. (1976a). Government
influence on the social science para-
digm. Sociological Quarterly,17:
146–161.
Useem, Michael. (1976b). State produc-
tion of social knowledge: Patterns of
government financing of academic
social research. American Sociolog-
ical Review,41:613–629.
Vallier, Ivan, ed. (1971a). Comparative
methods in sociology: Essays on
trends and applications.Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Vallier, Ivan. (1971b). Empirical com-
parisons of social structure. In
Comparative methods in sociology,
edited by I. Vallier, pp. 203–263.
Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Van den Berg, Harry, and Cees Van der
Veer. (1985). Measuring ideological
frames of references. Quality and
Quantity,19:105–118.
Van den Berge, Pierre L. (1967). Re-
search in South Africa: The story of
my experiences with tyranny. In
Ethics, politics and social research,
edited by G. Sjøberg. New York:
Schenckman.
Van der Zouwen, Johannes, and Johannes
Smit. (2004). Evaluating survey ques-
tions by analyzing patterns of behav-
ior codes and question-answer
sequences. In Methods for testing
and evaluating survey questionnaires,
edited by Stanley Presser et al., pp.
109–130. New York: Wiley.

Van Maanen, John. (1973). Observations
on the making of policemen. Human
Organization,32:407–418.
Van Maanen, John. (1982). Fieldwork on
the beat. In Varieties of qualitative
research,edited by J. Van Maanen,
J. Dabbs, Jr., and R. Faulkner, pp.
103–151. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Van Maanen, John. (1983a). Epilogue:
Qualitative methods reclaimed. In
Qualitative methodology,edited by
J. Van Maanen, pp. 247–268. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage.
Van Maanen, John. (1983b). The moral
fix: On the ethics of fieldwork. In
Contemporary field research,edited
by R. M. Emerson, pp. 269–287.
Boston: Little, Brown.
Van Maanen, John. (1988). Tales of the
field: On writing ethnography.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Poppel, Frans, and L. Day. (1996). A
test of Durkheim’s theory of suicide—
Without committing the “ecological
fallacy.”American Sociological Re-
view,61:500–507.
Vaughan, Diane. (1992). Theory elabo-
ration: The heuristics of case analy-
sis. In What is a case? Exploring the
foundations of social inquiry,edited
by C. Ragin and H. Becker, pp.
173–202. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Vaughan, Ted R. (1967). Government
intervention in social research: Polit-
ical and ethical dimensions of the
Wichita jury recordings. In Ethics,
politics and social research,edited
by G. Sjøberg. New York: Schenck-
man.
Veltmeyer, Henry. (1978). Marx’s two
methods of sociological analysis.
Sociological Inquiry,48:101–112.
Venkatesh, Sudhir. (2008). Gang leader
for a day: A rogue sociologist takes
to the streets. New York: Penguin.
Verba, Sidney. (1971). Cross-national
survey research. In Comparative
methods in sociology,edited by
I. Vallier, pp. 309–356. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Verba, Sidney, and Gary R. Orren.
(1985). Equality in America: The
view from the top.Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Vidich, Arthur Joseph, and Joseph Bens-
man. (1968). Small town in mass so-
ciety,rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Villarreal, Andrés. (2002). Political com-
petition and violence in Mexico.
American Sociological Review,
67:477–498.
Free download pdf