400 Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography
of the new man. Anti-Marxism is not a central issue for Obama’s followers, but Obama has
been thoroughly exposed to Marxist ideology and certainly does resolutely reject any
politics of class defense, class conflict, or class-based organization. The new political
liturgy of the Obama Nuremberg rally campaign style has attracted wide attention.- “A culture founded on mystical thought and the tragic and activist sense of life conceived as
the manifestation of the will to power, on the myth of youth as artificer of history, and on
the exaltation of the militarization of politics as the model of life and collective activity.”
The feckless and callow youth fanatics who fill the ranks of Obama’s lemming legions
have been widely discussed. Their mystical outlook is that of New Age, Age of Aquarius,
etc., as purveyed by a thousand petty hucksters from Oprah Winfrey to a whole phalanx of
swamis. The militarization aspect is present in the Al Gore Green Army proposal as well as
in Obama’s own Green Corps, and it can be expected that these features will be further
accentuated as the economic crisis deepens. - “A totalitarian conception of the primacy of politics, conceived as an integrating experience
to carry out the fusion of the individual and the masses in the organic and mystical unity of
the nation as an ethnic and moral community, adopting measures of discrimination and
persecution against those considered to be outside this community, either as enemies of the
regime or members of races considered inferior or otherwise dangerous for the integrity of
the nation.”
Obama operates within the totally relativistic concept of multiculturalism which has
been favored by the US ruling elite as a counterinsurgency strategy over the last four
decades, as we have shown. But relativistic multiculturalism is already distorted within
Obama’s own thinking by the aggressive and militant Afrocentrism and Black liberation
theology purveyed by his mentors, including the foundation-funded racist provocateur
Jeremiah Wright and his co-thinkers. So far, Obama has been deeply associated with
spokesman for white collective guilt and the need reparations to be paid to the black
community alone because of slavery and discrimination in the past, which amounts to
discrimination or persecution against other ethnic groups. At least two factors, however,
suggest that this may be destined to change. One is the indifference or hostility to Obama
exhibited by Hispanic and Asian voters, which may point to conflicts ahead. Obama is of
course a creature of the Trilateral Commission, where one of the leading planners is Samuel
Huntington, Brzezinski’s subaltern in the Carter National Security Council. In Huntington’s
infamous tome, The Clash of Civilizations, he argued that Latin America, precisely because
it was thoroughly Spanish and Catholic, could not be considered as a part of Western
civilization, but had to be viewed as a separate Latino-Hispanic entity all its own. This
thesis is so wildly absurd and ridiculous from a historical point of view that Huntington’s
evil intent could not have been more obvious. Huntington’s 2004 book Who Are We?
developed this same crackpot racist theory further, arguing that the greatest threat to the
future of the United States came from Latin American and especially Mexican immigrants.
Huntington thus appears to be thinking in terms of a divide-and-conquer strategy to
maintain financier rule in the United States under conditions of aggravated depression
breakdown crisis in which nativism will play a decisive role: this would allow the white and
black population to be played off against the rapidly growing Hispanic component. Obama,
needless to say, is already well-positioned to lead such an anti-Hispanic and anti-Asian