Appendices 417In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised me that
Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to he last time he used drugs and I did not
need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself. The last contact I had with “Mr. Young”
was in early December 2007 when he made it clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of
publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing
nothing more than milking information from me for Senator Obama’s use.
I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity United
Church of Christ – Obama’s now-former church — and was openly a homosexual. I also learned
that he was murdered on December 23, 2007. I have cooperated with the Chicago Police
Department in this matter by providing them the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of
2007 and I release them now publically in the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots
between these telephone numbers and Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105, 956-758-
1885, 956-758-8002, 02-685-7175; 612-466-1043.
In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a video
on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with Senator Obama
in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of what in hindsight
appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing falsehoods
circulating on the internet.
In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that test have
been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all. I would like to
make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have been subsequently advised
that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton pornography until earlier this year.
Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are junk science at best which is why
courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of
AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the examination. Indeed,
overlooked by almost everyone is that hitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland,
observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that
there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one
can possibly attain.
Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com received
$750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to publically
discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but instead
withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post the video
of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even removed posts from
their web site altogether, claiming that they had “had enough of the attacks by Sinclair’s supporters
and Sinclair himself.”
The polygraph results - as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger
community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an
attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the
proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the
identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and relevant
records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date, though the lawsuit