PRACTICING STRESS-FREE PRODUCTIVITY I PART TWO
time they glance at the screen. If you never had more
than a screenful of e-mails, this approach might
be reasonably functional, but with the volume most
professionals are dealing with these days, that doesn't
apply.
Again, getting "in" empty doesn't mean you've
handled everything. It means that you've DELETED what you
could, FILED what you wanted to keep but don't need to act on,
DONE the less-than-two-minute responses, and moved into
your reminder folders all the things you're waiting for and all your
actionable e-mails. Now you can open the "@ACTION" file and
review the e-mails that you've determined you need to spend time
on. Isn't that process easier to relate to than fumbling through
multiple screens, fearing all the while that you may miss some-
thing that'll blow up on you?
A Caution About Dispersing Reminders of Your Actions
There's an obvious danger in putting reminders of
things you need to do somewhere out of sight. The
function of an organization system is primarily to
supply the reminders you need to see when you need
to see them, so you can trust your choices about what
you're doing (and what you're not doing). Before you leave the
office for the day, the actionable e-mails that you still have pend-
ing must be reviewed individually, just like your "Calls" or "At
Computer" lists. In essence, "@ACTION" is an extension of your
"At Computer" list and should be handled in exactly the same
fashion. Your paper-based "Pending" workflow must likewise be
assessed like a list if the paper materials are being used as your
only reminders.
Distributing action triggers in a folder, on lists, and/or in an
e-mail system is perfectly OK, as long as you review all of the cate-
gories to which you've entrusted your triggers equally, as required. You
don't want things lurking in the recesses of your systems and not
being used for their intended purpose: reminding you.
It requires much
less energy to
maintain e-mail at
a zero base than at
a thousand base.
"Out of sight, out of
mind" is not really
out of mind.