Your Money or Your Life!

(Brent) #1

6/YOUR MONEY OR YOUR LIFE!


increase in wages. A Nike spokesperson worried that Indonesia
might be in the process of becoming 'too expensive for the
market'. Nike takes a similar approach to Vietnam, where in
1997 it dismissed 447 of its 6,000 workers, who had had the
audacity to struggle for a wage increase that would give them
more than the monthly minimum wage of S45 (Le Monde, 24
June 1997).


  1. The crisis that has rocked S outheast Asia - specifically Thailand,
    Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia - from the summer of
    1997 onwards, shows the limits of a 'development' model based
    on low wages, an open economy and export-oriented growth
    that puts the internal market on the back burner. This model
    goes hand in hand with a permanent tendency towards the
    deepening of the current account deficit. As in the case of the
    Mexican crisis in 1994, this problem is rooted in a basic
    imbalance. Imports grow more quickly than exports, due to a
    relationship of sustained dependence that leads such countries
    to import most of their industrial goods and most luxury items
    for the rich. Exports grow only in proportion to such a country's
    ability to maintain 'attractive' wage levels, in a context of
    competition from subsidiaries in other countries. Growth can be
    very strong, but it is built on a destabilising leap forward that
    presupposes an ongoing distortion of the country's socio­
    economic structure. The total liberalisation of capital inflows
    and outflows puts these countries at the mercy of possible
    massive and sudden outflows of capital in search of quick profits
    or a safe haven. The crisis resulting from this capital outflow
    increases government and domestic companies' short-term
    need for liquidity. Debt rises very quickly (Chapter 16).

  2. Beginning in the sixteenth century, the development of inter­
    national credit has followed close on the heels of the extension
    of European capitalism across the planet (Chapter 6).

  3. At the end of the nineteenth century and in the early part of the
    twentieth century, the use of foreign debt as a weapon for
    domination and destruction played a key role in the policies of
    the main capitalist powers towards second-rank powers (China
    and the Ottoman Empire) that could have become capitalist
    powers themselves (Chapter 6).

  4. During the 1930s external debt crisis in Latin America, 14
    countries in the region unilaterally decided to suspend debt

Free download pdf