193
C hapter 12
RULES AND TRUST
A
n investor is going to entrust her wealth to someone else.
Shouldn’t the investor have a high degree of confidence in that
person’s ability and integrity? Of course. It is simple common sense,
but how to assess ability and integrity is a bit trickier.
Graham used the quantitative analysis of the sort described in
Part II as a proxy. If the numbers loo kgood year after year and
provide a basis for thinking that they will continue to do so, that
may suggest that management is able.
Many other investors, including Warren Buffett in his early days,
learned hard lessons from paying too little attention to management
integrity. True, if a company’s numbers loo kgood and are accurate,
its managers are probably able and trustworthy. If the numbers look
good but are misleading, management may be neither. As Buffett
reminds us, “In the long run, managements stressing accounting
appearances over economic substance usually achieve little of ei-
ther.”^1
Therefore, integrity is an additional independent factor in in-
vestment selection. Is there a sensible way to thin kabout managerial
integrity? Buffett says the key is to invest with managers you “like,
trust, and admire.” His test for whether an investment meets this
requirement is whether the managers are “men you would be pleased
to see your daughter marry.”^2
Does this “son-in-law” standard help? It may only suggest avoid-
ing managers you would not be pleased to invite over for a Super
Bowl party, but this is a great deal more meaningful than it sounds.
THE FAMILY MANAGER
All business transactions depend on trust and always have. Contracts
help define and protect rights, but entering into one calls for some
expectation that the other party will do what he says he will do.
Copyright 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click Here for Terms of Use