Free eBooks at Planet eBook.com 1‘Ni dieu, ni maitre’—that, also, is what you want; and there-
fore ‘Cheers for natural law!’— is it not so? But, as has been
said, that is interpretation, not text; and somebody might
come along, who, with opposite intentions and modes of
interpretation, could read out of the same ‘Nature,’ and
with regard to the same phenomena, just the tyrannical-
ly inconsiderate and relentless enforcement of the claims
of power—an interpreter who should so place the unex-
ceptionalness and unconditionalness of all ‘Will to Power’
before your eyes, that almost every word, and the word
‘tyranny’ itself, would eventually seem unsuitable, or like a
weakening and softening metaphor—as being too human;
and who should, nevertheless, end by asserting the same
about this world as you do, namely, that it has a ‘necessary’
and ‘calculable’ course, NOT, however, because laws obtain
in it, but because they are absolutely LACKING, and ev-
ery power effects its ultimate consequences every moment.
Granted that this also is only interpretation—and you will
be eager enough to make this objection?—well, so much the
better.
- All psychology hitherto has run aground on moral prej-
udices and timidities, it has not dared to launch out into
the depths. In so far as it is allowable to recognize in that
which has hitherto been written, evidence of that which
has hitherto been kept silent, it seems as if nobody had
yet harboured the notion of psychology as the Morpholo-
gy and DEVELOPMENT-DOCTRINE OF THE WILL TO
POWER, as I conceive of it. The power of moral prejudices