N ow we see that Equation (3.38) leads to
which is in a form identical to that of Equation (3.35) for the mass functions – a
satisfying result. We should add here that this relationship between the condi-
tional density function and the joint density function is obtained at the expense
of Equation (3.33) for FX Y (xy). We say ‘at the expen se of’ because the defin-
ition given to FX Y (xy) does not lead to a convenient relationship between
FX Y (xy) and FX Y (x, y), that is,
This inconvenience, however, is not a severe penalty as we deal with density
functions and mass functions more often.
When random variables X and Y are independent, FX Y (xy) FX (x) and, as
seen from Equation (3.42),
and
which shows again that the joint density function is equal to the product of the
associated marginal density functions when X and Y are independent.
Finally, let us note that, when random variables X and Y are discrete,
and, in the case of a continuous random variable,
Comparison of these equations with Equations (3.7) and (3.12) reveals they are
id entical to those relating these functions for X alone.
Extensions of the above results to the case of more than two random vari-
ables are again straightforward. Starting from
Random Variables and Probability D istributions 63
fXY
xjy
dFXY
xjy
dx
fXY
x;y
fY
y
; fY
y6 0 ;
3 : 42
j
j
j
FXY
xjy6
FXY
x;y
FY
y
: 3 : 43
j
fXY
xjyfX
x;
3 : 44
fXY
x;yfX
xfY
y;
3 : 45
FXY
xjy
i:Xxix
i 1
pXY
xijy;
3 : 46
FXY
xjy
Zx
1
fXY
ujydu:
3 : 47
P
ABCP
AjBCP
BjCP
C