Theories_of_Personality 7th Ed Feist

Feist−Feist: Theories of

Personality, Seventh

Edition

V. Learning Theories 15. Skinner: Behavioral

Analysis

© The McGraw−Hill^467

Companies, 2009

Emotions
Skinner (1974) recognized the subjective existence of emotions, of course, but he
insisted that behavior must not be attributed to them. He accounted for emotions
by the contingencies of survival and the contingencies of reinforcement. Throughout
the millennia, individuals who were most strongly disposed toward fear or anger
were those who escaped from or triumphed over danger and thus were able to pass
on those characteristics to their offspring. On an individual level, behaviors
followed by delight, joy, pleasure, and other pleasant emotions tend to be reinforced,
thereby increasing the probability that these behaviors would recur in the life of
that individual.

Purpose and Intention
Skinner (1974) also recognized the concepts of purpose and intention, but again, he
cautioned against attributing behavior to them. Purpose and intention exist within
the skin, but they are not subject to direct outside scrutiny. A felt, ongoing purpose
may itself be reinforcing. For example, if you believe that your purpose for jogging
is to feel better and live longer, then this thought per se acts as a reinforcing stimu-
lus, especially while undergoing the drudgery of jogging or when trying to explain
your motivation to a nonrunner.
A person may “intend” to see a movie Friday evening because viewing similar
films has been reinforcing. At the time the person intends to go to the movie, she
feels a physical condition within the body and labels it an “intention.” What are
called intentions or purposes, therefore, are physically felt stimuli within the organ-
ism and not mentalistic events responsible for behavior. “The consequences of oper-
ant behavior are not what the behavior is now for; they are merely similar to the con-
sequences that have shaped and maintained it” (Skinner, 1987a, p. 57).

Complex Behavior

Human behavior can be exceedingly complex, yet Skinner believed that even the
most abstract and complex behavior is shaped by natural selection, cultural evolu-
tion, or the individual’s history of reinforcement. Once again, Skinner did not deny
the existence of higher mental processes such as cognition, reason, and recall; nor
did he ignore complex human endeavors like creativity, unconscious behavior,
dreams, and social behavior.

Higher Mental Processes
Skinner (1974) admitted that human thought is the most difficult of all behaviors to
analyze; but potentially, at least, it can be understood as long as one does not resort
to a hypothetical fiction such as “mind.” Thinking, problem solving, and reminiscing
are covert behaviors that take place within the skin but not inside the mind. As be-
haviors, they are amenable to the same contingencies of reinforcement as overt be-
haviors. For example, when a woman has misplaced her car keys, she searches for
them because similar searching behavior has been previously reinforced. In like
manner, when she is unable to recall the name of an acquaintance, she searches
for that name covertly because this type of behavior has earlier been reinforced.

Chapter 15 Skinner: Behavioral Analysis 461