Home Gardens in Nepal

(coco) #1

are made. Economic and nutritional values of these vegetables are identified with their
botanical description. The Tenth Plan has set a target of 137,441 ha of land coverage with
general vegetable program and kitchen garden minikits demonstration programs through
District Agriculture Development Offices (GN/MOAC, 2002).


Fruit garden programme
This programme supports fruit gardens based on the local climate, environment and demand
of the farmers to meet the household’s daily requirement of fruits and nutrition as well as
provides local market facilities. During Tenth Plan, 5000 ha of land will cover under this
program (GN / MOAC, 2002).


Honeybee development programme
Use of honeybee in the garden helps to increase the production and productivity of the crops
by increasing the pollination activity. Farmer can earn additional income as well. The bee
keeping programme is focused on women, disadvantaged and pro-poor farmers. The bee
keeping requires a small space and can be carried out within the homestead of farmer even
by small and landless farmers.


Fish kitchen pond programme
It aims to fulfil the animal protein requirement of farming families and increase income by
selling the surplus fish. Fisheries Development Directorate has been implementing a fish
kitchen pond programme for family consumption purpose of farmers. Fish kitchen ponds also
add beauty to the home garden.


ISSUES/CONTRADICTIONS TO AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-BIODIVERSITY IN NEPAL



  • Under Government of Nepal’s agricultural policy provides extension services, input and
    other support services for maximizing yield per unit of land. It also encourages the
    adoption of modern high yielding varieties, commercial farming that demands heavy use
    of production inputs including agro-chemicals. This practice has contributed to erosion of
    agro-biodiversity and degradation of natural resources. Paradoxically, conservation of
    agro- biodiversity is reported as incompatible with modern agriculture development
    initiatives.

  • Transformation of agricultural system and land use pattern are costing more to resource
    poor farmers and people living below poverty line.

  • Land use policy does not exist in Nepal. There is ample evidence to show the effect of
    urbanization and industrialization on agro-biodiversity. The most fertile lands are
    converted to residential areas and industrial estate.

  • Budget allocated for agro-biodiversity conservation is not sufficient i.e. 3 million during
    Tenth Plan period and its program has been prioritized as a secondary priority.

  • Nepal has become a member of WTO, one consequence is that the policies related to
    conservation, registration and utilization of agro-biodiversity has not been given utmost
    importance.

  • Agricultural policy has yet to address the constraints and potentials of home gardening in
    Nepal.


CONCLUSION

Agriculture, the main source of employment, is facing three challenges namely to ensure
food security, reduce poverty and promote sustainable management of natural resources.
Home gardens are an important resource for food security in Nepal. The major benefits from
home garden are better nutrition for the farmers; they receive income and meet socio-
cultural needs. Along with these benefits, they help to reduce environmental pollution and
soil erosion and to conserve the agro-biodiversity. For effective extension of home gardens,

Free download pdf