250 Part 3 Financial Assets
The increasing availability of international securities is mak-
ing it possible to achieve a better risk-return trade-o" than
could be obtained by investing only in U.S. securities. So
investing overseas might result in a portfolio with less risk
but a higher expected return. This result occurs because of
low correlations between the returns on U.S. and interna-
tional securities, along with potentially high returns on over-
seas stocks.
Figure 8-6, presented earlier, demonstrated that an
investor can reduce the risk of his or her portfolio by holding
a number of stocks. The # gure that follows suggests that
investors may be able to reduce risk even further by holding
a portfolio of stocks from all around the world, given the fact
that the returns on domestic and international stocks are not
perfectly correlated.
Even though foreign stocks represent roughly 60% of
the worldwide equity market and despite the apparent ben-
e# ts from investing overseas, the typical U.S. investor still
puts less than 10% of his or her money in foreign stocks. One
possible explanation for this reluctance to invest overseas is
that investors prefer domestic stocks because of lower trans-
actions costs. However, this explanation is questionable
because recent studies reveal that investors buy and sell
overseas stocks more frequently than they trade their domes-
tic stocks. Other explanations for the domestic bias include
the additional risks from investing overseas (for example,
exchange rate risk) and the fact that the typical U.S. investor
is uninformed about international investments and/or thinks
that international investments are extremely risky. It has
been argued that world capital markets have become more
integrated, causing the correlation of returns between di" er-
ent countries to increase, which reduces the bene# ts from
international diversi# cation. In addition, U.S. corporations
are investing more internationally, providing U.S. investors
with international diversi# cation even if they purchase only
U.S. stocks.
Whatever the reason for their relatively small holdings
of international assets, our guess is that in the future U.S.
investors will shift more of their assets to overseas
investments.
Source: For further reading, see also Kenneth Kasa, “Measuring the Gains from International Portfolio Diversi# cation,” Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco Weekly Letter, Number 94–14, April 8, 1994.
THE BENEFITS OF DIVERSIFYING OVERSEAS
U.S. Stocks
U.S. and International Stocks
Number of Stocks
in the Portfolio
Portfolio Risk, σp
(%)