152 III More on Divisibility
1993 Fermat’s assertion had been established in this way for allnless than four million.
However, these methods did not lead to a complete proof of ‘Fermat’s last theorem’.
As will be seen in Chapter XIII, a complete solution was first found by Wiles (1995),
using quite different methods.
3 Multiplicative Functions
We define a functionf :N→Cto be anarithmetical function. The set of all arith-
metical functions can be given the structure of a commutative ring in the following
way.
For any two functions f,g :N→C, we define theirconvolutionorDirichlet
product f∗g:N→Cby
f∗g(n)=∑
d|nf(d)g(n/d).Dirichlet multiplication satisfies the usual commutative and associative laws:
Lemma 24For any three functions f,g,h:N→C,
f∗g=g∗f, f∗(g∗h)=(f∗g)∗h.Proof Sincen/druns through the positive divisors ofnat the same time asd,
f∗g(n)=∑
d|nf(d)g(n/d)=
∑
d|nf(n/d)g(d)=g∗f(n).To prove the associative law, putG=g∗h.Thenf∗G(n)=∑
de=nf(d)G(e)=∑
de=nf(d)∑
d′d′′=eg(d′)h(d′′)=
∑
dd′d′′=nf(d)g(d′)h(d′′).Similarly, if we putF=f∗g, we obtain
F∗h(n)=∑
de=nF(e)h(d)=∑
de=n∑
d′d′′=ef(d′)g(d′′)h(d)=
∑
dd′d′′=nf(d′)g(d′′)h(d).HenceF∗h(n)=f∗G(n).