422 X A Character Study
Consider now the induced representationψ ̃iofG.SinceHis a normal subgroup,
it follows from (12) that
ψ ̃i(s)=ψ ̃iv(s)=0ifs∈G\H,
ψ ̃i(s)=ψ ̃iv(s)=ψi(s)+ψiv(s) ifs∈H.
Henceψ ̃i=ψ ̃ivand
∑
s∈G
ψ ̃i(s)ψ ̃i(s−^1 )=
∑
s∈H
{ψi(s)+ψiv(s)}{ψi(s−^1 )+ψiv(s−^1 )}
=
∑
s∈H
ψi(s)ψi(s−^1 )+
∑
s∈H
ψiv(s)ψiv(s−^1 )
+
∑
s∈H
{ψi(s)ψiv(s−^1 )+ψi(s−^1 )ψvi(s)}.
Consequently, by the orthogonality relations forH,
∑
s∈G
ψ ̃i(s)ψ ̃i(s−^1 )= 2 h+ 2
∑
s∈H
ψi(s)ψiv(s−^1 ).
Ifψiandψivare inequivalent, the second term on the right vanishes and we obtain
∑
s∈G
ψ ̃i(s)ψ ̃i(s−^1 )=g.
Thus the induced representationψ ̃iofGis irreducible, its degree being twice that
ofψi.
On the other hand, ifψiandψivare equivalent, then
∑
s∈G
ψ ̃i(s)ψ ̃i(s−^1 )= 2 g.
Ifψ ̃i=
∑
jmjχjis the decomposition ofψ ̃iinto irreducible charactersχjofG,itfol-
lows from (8) that
∑
jm
2
j=2. This implies that
ψ ̃idecomposes into two inequivalent
irreducible characters ofG,sayψ ̃i=χk+χl. We will show that in factχl=χkλ.
Ifχk(s)=0foralls∈/H,then
∑
s∈H
χk(s)χk(s−^1 )=
∑
s∈G
χk(s)χk(s−^1 )=g= 2 h
and hence, by the same argument as that just used, the restriction ofχktoHdecom-
poses into two inequivalent irreducible characters ofH. Since the restriction ofψ ̃ito
His 2ψi, this is a contradiction. We conclude thatχk(s)=0forsomes∈/H,i.e.
χkλ=χk.Sinceχkoccurs once in the decomposition ofψ ̃i,andψ ̃i(s)=0ifs∈/H,