(a)
(b)
L M L E M
E
4 −C(CH 3 ) 3
or
3,4−dimethyl
L M
3 −Cl
3 −N(CH 3 ) 2 3 −CH 3
2 −Cl
4 −F 4−NO 2
3 −CF 3 and 3−Br and 3−I
3,5−dichloro and 3,5−(CF 3 ) 2
3 −NO 2
E
E
L
L
E M
3 −Cl 4 −N(CH 3 ) 2
4 −NH 2 3 −CH 3 , 4−N(CH 3 ) 2
or 3−CH 3
or 4−OH
or 4−CH 3 O
M
H
4 −Cl
4 −CH 3 −
L M
4 −CH 3 O− 3,4−Dichloro
E
4 −CF 3
2,4−dichloro
4 −NO 2
3 −CF 3 , 4−Cl
3 −CF 3 , 4−NO 2
CH 3
(CH 3 ) 2 CH−
E M
L
L M
L
M
or
C 2 H 5 −
E
Stop
−CH 2 Cl
or
−CH 2 CF 3
or
or
H
CH 3 OCH 2 −
or
CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 − −CF
3
−CH 2 SCH 3
Ph−
or
PhCH 2 −
(CH 3 ) 3 C− or
PhCH 2 −
PhCH 2 CH 2 −
E
Figure 4.7 The Topliss decision trees for (a) an unfused aromatic ring and (b) an aliphatic side
chain. (L¼significantly lower activity, E ¼about the same activity and M¼ significantly
greater activity). Reproduced by permission of Taylor and Francis Ltd. from theJournal of
Medicinal Chemistry15, No. 10 1006 (1972), http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals. Utilisation of
Operational Schemes for Analog Synthesis in Drug Design by J G Topliss
is followed and the appropriate analogue synthesized. This procedure is
repeated, the activity of each new analogue being compared with that of its
precursor in order to determine which branch of the tree gives the next ana-
logue. Suppose, for example, that a compound A (Figure 4.8) is active against
90 THE SAR AND QSAR APPROACHES TO DRUG DESIGN