Signals and Systems - Electrical Engineering

(avery) #1

480 C H A P T E R 8: Discrete-Time Signals and Systems


FIGURE 8.8
Nonlinear system:
(a) square root of 2,
(b) square root of 4
compared with twice the
square root of 2, and
(c) sum of previous
responses with response
when computing square
root of 2 + 4. Figure (b)
shows scaling does not
hold and (c) shows that
additivity does not hold
either. The system is
nonlinear.

0 1 2 3 4

(a)

(b)

(c)

5 6 7 8 9

0123456789

0

1

2

0

2

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0

2

4

n

n

n

square root of 2

square root of 4

square root of 6

y^1

[n

]

y^2

[n
]

y^3

[n

]

which is converging to 2, the square root of 4 (see Figure 8.8). Thus, as indicated before, when
n→∞, theny[n]=y[n−1]=Y, for some valueY, which according to the difference equation
satisfies the relationY=0.5Y+0.5( 4 /Y)orY=


4 =2.

Suppose then that the input isα=2, half of what it was before. If the system is linear, we should
get half the previous output according to the scaling property. That is not the case, however. For
the same initial conditiony[0]=1, we obtain recursively forα[n]= 2 u[n−1]:

y[0]= 1
y[1]=0.5[1+2]=1.5

y[2]=0.5

[

1.5+

2

1.5

]

=1.4167

..

.

This solution is clearly not half of the previous one. Moreover, asn→∞, we expecty[n]=
y[n−1]=Y, forYthat satisfies the relationY=0.5Y+0.5( 2 /Y)orY=


2 =1.4142, so that
the solution is tending to


2 and not to 2 as it would if the system were linear. Finally, if we add
Free download pdf