694 C H A P T E R 11: Introduction to the Design of Discrete Filters
If we replace the first equation into the second we obtain an expression containingw[n]
andw[n−2] andx[n] so that we cannot expressy[n] directly in terms of the input. Instead, consider
the Z-transforms of the above equation,
( 1 +0.1z−^1 )W(z)=X(z)
Y(z)=( 1 +1.5z−^1 )W(z) (11.70)
Thus, we obtain from the top equation in Equation (11.70):
W(z)=
X(z)
1 +0.1z−^1
which when replaced in the bottom equation in Equation (11.70) gives
Y(z)=
X(z)( 1 +1.5z−^1 )
1 +0.1z−^1
giving the transfer functionH(z). n
Remarks
n Direct form II is more advantageous than direct form I because of the consequence of using fewer delays.
We will use direct form II to realize first- and second-order modules in the cascade and parallel realizations.
n The cascade and the parallel realizations will connect first- and second-order systems to realize a given
transfer function. General direct form II realizations for a first and second-order filter with respective
transfer functions
H 1 (z)=
b 0 +b 1 z−^1
1 +a 1 z−^1
(11.71)
H 2 (z)=
b 0 +b 1 z−^1 +b 2 z−^2
1 +a 1 z−^1 +a 2 z−^2
(11.72)
are given in Figure 11.28. The coefficients of the above transfer functions are real. The realization of H 1 (z)
is obtained by getting rid of the lower part of the realization (i.e., getting rid of the constant multipliers
FIGURE 11.28
Direct form II realization of first- and
second-order filters (for the first-order filters
leta 2 =b 2 = 0 thus eliminating the constant
multipliers and the lower delay).
x[n] y[n]
w[n]
z−^1
−
+
+
z−^1
− b 0
b 1
a 2 b 2
a 1