In performing an experiment, exact whole-number ratios are difficult to
guarantee, so calculations with logarithms are common. Evaluating the value
ofkusing the first set of data:2.91 10 ^7 M
sk(0.00636 M)^1 (0.00384 M)^2k3.103
M1
2 sb.To evaluate k , we need to recognize that the pseudo first-order rate con-
stant can be approximated by combining the kand the [B]^2 terms. If we are
given [B] 0.500 M, thenk3.103
M1
2 s(0.500 M)
2k0.776 ^1
swhere the units for k work out as expected. The pseudo first-order rate law
would be, under these conditions,rate 0.776
1
s[A]
To finish this section, let us briefly consider some of the experimental con-
siderations of rate law determinations. It is typical in deriving physical chemical
expressions to presume that our chemical system will follow the predictions of
these equations (in these cases, [A]t) perfectly. For an ideal kinetics experiment,
one would expect to get a plot like that in Figure 20.5 for a first-order reaction.
However, in reality the data are rarely so perfect. In a real experiment in
a real laboratory, a researcher might get some scatter in the plotted data.
Table 20.1 gives some values of concentrations versus time, which are plot-
ted in Figure 20.6. In this case, it might be obvious that a straight line is the
best fit to the experimental data and that the reaction follows first-order ki-
netics, even though there is some scatter in the plotted points. However, an
experimenter should be careful: consider plotting the same data as if it re-
lated to a second-order reaction. This is shown in Figure 20.7. For the short20.3 Characteristics of Specific Initial Rate Laws 693Timeln[A]t1.050.70
0
Time (min)8ln[A]t6421.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0.80
0.75Figure 20.5 If a perfect kinetics experiment
were performed on a first-order reaction, your
graph might look like this: all data points on a
line. However, reality isn’t usually this perfect: see
Figures 20.6 and 20.7.
Figure 20.6 Data from Table 20.1 are plotted to see if the reaction fol-
lows first-order kinetics. Note the scatter in the experimental data that
suggests that the fit to a straight line, in this case, is possible but not con-
vincing. Compare with Figure 20.7.
Table 20.1 Kinetic data for Figures 20.6
and 20.7
Time (min) [A]t ln [A]t 1/[A]t
0 2.719 1.000 0.3678
1 2.612 0.9601 0.3829
2 2.586 0.9501 0.3867
3 2.509 0.9199 0.3985
4 2.459 0.8997 0.40660.440.36
0
Time (min)81/[A]t6420.43
0.42
0.41
0.40
0.39
0.38
0.37Figure 20.7 Data from Table 20.1 are plotted to see if the reaction fol-
lows second-order kinetics. Note the scatter in the experimental data that
suggests that the fit to this straight line also does not convince us that this
is a second-order reaction. Compare with Figure 20.6.