CHAPTER 16 Applications of King’s Theory of Goal Attainment 245Table 16–1 Application of the Interacting Systems FrameworkTOPIC AUTHOR(S) YEAR
Anxiety
Autonomy
Change
Child health
Chronic mental illness
Communication
Community assessment
CommunityContinuing education
EducationFamily therapy
MenopauseNeural tube defect
Nursing administrationNursing diagnosis
Operating roomPatient educationPerception
Reproductive health
Smoking
Social support
Theory-based practice*Indicates thesis or dissertationLaFontaine
Glenn*
DeFeo
Steele
Doornbos
Daubenmire, Searles, and Ashton
Hanchett
Hanchett
Myks Babb, Fouladbakhsh, and Hanchett
King
Asay and Ossler
Brown and Lee
Daubenmire
King
Gulitz and King
King
Froman and Sanderson
Daubenmire and King
Gonot
Sharts-Hopko
Heggie and Gangar
Hobdell
Elberson
Sieloff
Byrne-Coker, Fradley, Harris, Tomarchio, and Caron
Gill, Hopwood-Jones, Tyndall, Gregoroff, LeBlance,
Lovett, Rasco, and Ross
Spees
Martin
King and Tarsitano
Bunting
Davis and Dearman
Kneeshaw
Frey
MessmerWest
Byrne and Schreiber1989
1989
1990
1981
1995
1978
1988
1990
1988
1984
1984
1980
1989
1989
1988
1986
1985
1973
1986
1995
1992
1995
1989
1995
1990
19951991
1990
1982
1988
1991
1990
1989
1995
1992
1991
1990Concept Development
Within the Framework
Concept development within a conceptual frame-
work is particularly valuable, as it often explicates
concepts more clearly than a theorist may have
done in his or her original work. Concept develop-
ment may also demonstrate how other concepts, of
interest to nursing, can be examined through a
“nursing lens.” Such explication further assists the
development of nursing knowledge by enabling
the nurse to better understand the application of
the concept within specific practice situations.
Examples of concepts developed from within
King’s work include the following: empathy
(Alligood, Evans, & Wilt, 1995), health of a social