226 Integrals
bounded and hence that there is a constant positive M for which -M <_
f (x) S M or I f (x) I<= M. Therefore,
1F(x + Ax) - F(x) I <
I fxz+AxM dt MThe sandwich theorem then implies that(4.354) lim F(x + Ax) = F(x)
Ax- o
and hence that F is continuous at x. It can be observed that we have
proved more than was promised; the function F must have bounded
difference quotients. To prove (4.352), let x be a point at which f is
continuous. From the two formulasF(x + Ax) - F(x) 1 rx+-'x
Ax_
Axf (t) dt, Ax) =
Ax 1x+Axf(x)
dtwe obtain
F(x + Ax) - F(x) -
(4.355)
Ax Ax) Yx x - f(x)]dt.Let e > 0. Choose a number 3 > 0 such that
If(t) - f(x) I < E/2 (it - xI < s).
Then when JAxI < S, we can use Theorems 4.343 and 4.341 to obtainF(x + Ax) - F(x)- AX)
I<
Ax I1 x+Az
x xIf(t) - f(x) I dt
1 fx+AxE2 dt = 2 < E.
Ax xATherefore,(4.356) limF(x + Ax) - F(x) = f(x)
AX-0 Axand (4.352) follows from the definition of F'(x). This completes the proof
of Theorem 4.35.
Supposing now that f is continuous over a < x < b, we proceed to show
how Theorem 4.35 can be used to obtain the promised method for evalu-
ating Riemann integrals. Putting x = a in (4.351) shows thatF(a) = 0.
Putting x = b in (4.351) and then changing the dummy variable of inte-
gration from t to x givesF(b) = f a'f(x) dx.
Therefore,(4.36) fab f(x) dx= F(b) - F(a).