9.2 Derivatives and integrals of exponentialsand logarithms 491
But (H''Q)XP = (H),P)xQ and (HxQ)P = (H>P)Q, and it follows that each member of
(5) is HxP. Thus (5) is true and this proves (4). Just as the rational numberr
defined by r = -4$ is representable in the forms
(^63) (7)(-9) -9
r -28 - (7)(4)
_
-4-'
so also each rational number r given in the form r = P/Q, where P and Q are
integers, is uniquely representable in the form p/q, where P = Ap, Q= Xq, and
A, p, and q are integers for which q > 0 and the integers IpI andq are relatively
prime, that is, have no common positive integer factor different from 1. This
fact and (4) show that when P and Q are integers for which Q 0, we can define
aP/Q by the first of the formulas
(6) aP/Q = (aP)1/Q = (al/Q)P
a
with assurance that the whole formula is correct and that the formula remains
correct when we multiply or divide both P and Q by the same integer X provided
A 0 when we divide. This completes the definition of ax whenx is rational.
To prove that the laws (2) hold when x and y are rational, we can letx = p/n
and y = q/n, where p, q, n are integers and n > 0, to obtain
axay = (aP/n)(a4/n) = (a11n)P(al/n)Q = (alln)P+Q = a(P+4)ln = ax+y
and
so
((ax)y)n2 = ((\01n14)1/nln2 = (((aP)1/n)Q)n = (((a")Q)lln)n = aP4
(ax),l = (aPs)1/n2 = aPQln2 = axy.
9.2 Derivatives and integrals of exponentials and logarithms
Let a > 1. Looking forward to a derivation of a formula for the deriva-
tive of the function f for which f(x) = ax, we use h instead of Ax, write
(9.21)
and observe that
ax+h - ax= (all - 1) az,
d
=
ax+h -ax ah-1
(9.22)
dx
ax ho
h
h-0 h
J ax
provided the limits exist. If we succeed in proving that, for some con-
stant A which may depend upon a, the first of the formulas
(9.221) lim ah
h
1
ah
= A,
hlli m h
1= A
is valid, then the second will also be valid because
ah -
1
h -
1 1
h h -
lim = lim a = lim lim a '' a 1
a
=h_
h-.0- h h-+0+ -h h-O+ h h
and we will be able to conclude that
=A
(9.222)
TX
ax = Aax.