718
Let a and ei and e2 be positive numbers.
S1 and S2 such that
Appendix 1
Choose positive numbers
(17) I f(x) - LI < ei (0 < Ix - aI < S1),
(18) Ig(x) - MI < e2 (0 < Ix - al < S2).
Let S be the lesser of S1 and S2. Then, when 0 < Ix - al < S, we have
(19) I [f(x) + g(x)1 - [L + M1I = I[f(x) - L] + [g(x) - MII
< If(x) -LI +Ig(x) - MI <el+f2.
If we set El = f2 = e/2, then (16) and (19) give
(20) I [f(x) + g(x)l - [lim f(x) + lim g(x)lI < Ex-.a x-+a
when 0 < Ix - at < S. This proves (13).
To prove (14), we bridge the gap between f(x)g(x) and LM by sub-
tracting and adding the term f(x)M and using (17) and (18) to obtain
(21) if(x)g(x) - LMI = I [f(x)g(x) - f(x)Ml + [f(x)M - LM]I
If(x)I Ig(x) - MI + If(x) - LI IMI
< (ILI + El)E2 + e1M
when 0 < Ix - at < S. If we choose el such that e1IMI < E/2 and after-
ward choose E2 such that (ILI + E1)e2 < E/2, then (21) gives
(22) If(x)g(x) - LMI < E (0 < Ix - at < S).
This proves (14). To prove (15), we begin by proving that
(23) 1a
g(x) M
when lim g(x) = M and M s 0. The more general result (15) will then
r-. a
follow from (14) and the fact that
(24) lm lm [ f (x)1 1 = urnI 1[urnI ].
,a g(x) [g(x)l x-.a x-'a g(x)
To prove (23), we suppose that M 0, that e2 has been chosen such that
0 < E2 < IMI/2, and that S has been chosen such that
(25) Ig(x) - MI < E2
whenever 0 < Ix - at < S. Then
(26) IMI = Ig(x) - M - g(x)I s Ig(x) - MI + Ig(x)I < e2 + Ig(x)I
and hence
(27) I8(x)I>IMI-E2>M-M=M