Proofs of basic theorems on limits 719whenever 0 < Ix - at < S. Therefore,
(28)
1 -.1 i _ M - g(x) < e2 2e2
g(x) MR ' g(x)M , =(M/2)M__
M2when 0 < Ix - at < S. If we choose e2 such that 2e2/M2 < e, we will
have
(29)1
g(x) lim g(x) i< e
x-4awhenever 0 < Ix - at < S. This proves (15) and completes the proof
of Theorem E.Theorem F
If
(30)then(31)and conversely.lim f(x) = L
x-aliralf(x) - LI = 0
x-.aThe assertion (30) means that1 Ito each positive number a there corre-
sponds a positive number S such that(32) If(x) -LI <e
whenever 0 < Ix - at < S. The assertion (31) means that to each
positive number a there corresponds a positive number S such that(33) I If(x) - LI - 01 < e
whenever 0 < Ix - at < S. Since the left members of (32) and (33)
are equal, each assertion implies the other.Theorem G (sandwich theorem, or flyswatter theorem)
If, for some positive number p,(34) g(x) < f(x) 5 h(x)
whena - p <x <aandwhena<x<a+p,andif
(35) lim g(x) = L, lim h(x) = L,then(36) lim f(x) = L.
x-+a
The primitive idea behind this theorem may be phrased as follows.
If two slices of bread (or two books) are near Minneapolis and if a slice