Responding
tothe
Subject:ASpecial
ObjectRichardNoblewasunsurewhattomake
ofthe
mannequinatfirst.Lookingatthedetailedcarvingofthefeet,hewasfasci-
natedby
theirresemblancetorealfeet,buttherestofthemannequinseemed
cruder.Overall,itimpressedhimasbe-
ingaweird,freakishobject
Nobletriedplacingitinvarioussitua-tions—inbed,inthe
bathroom,slumpedinachairasif itweredrunk—
butthemannequindidnot
seemtofitnaturallyintoanyofthesesituations.Then,seeingitsprawledonthefloor,Noblewasstruckbyitsresemblancetoacorpse,andhedecidedtousethemannequintomakeastatementaboutdeath.Explaininghowhenarrowedthisbasicresponsedowntoworkabledimensions,Noblerecalled,"Iaskedmyself,'What'skillingpeoplenowadaysbesidesnaturalcauses9'Iimmediatelythoughtofwar.Soithadtohaveblood.Thencamethedeci-siononwherethemannequinwasshot.Woulditbeintheleg,thefaceorthechest?IbegantorememberfilmsIhadseenintrainingcampwhenIwasintheArmy—
especiallyonehorriblefilmaboutchestwounds.Thatmadeupmymind.''Noblewrappedthemannequininasheet,arrangingitsothattheform
wouldbeapparentandleavingtherealisticfeetexposed.HeplacedhisownArmydogtagsonthefigure'schest.Thenhecon-coctedasimulationofbloodbymixingredandblackIndiainkandglycerine,anddaubedtheshroudwithit.Theonlyilluminationcamefromaskylightinhisstudio.Heshotthepicturefromananglethat,asheputit,"wouldlookasifyouhadjustcomeuponthisbodyandwerelookingdownonitfromeyelevel."Thepicturewasnottechnicallyper-fectbyanymeans,"heconfessed."Thebloodistoodark,andthesheetlookswashedoutinplaces.Usually,myworkisstrongly'designed,'butIdidn'twantanythingfancyorcosmetichere.Thisisapictureaboutwaranddeath,"