8 MECHANISMS OF DRUG ACTION(PHARMACODYNAMICS)
ANTAGONISM
Competitive antagonists combine with the same receptor as an
endogenous agonist (e.g. ranitidineat histamine H 2 -receptors),
but fail to activate it. When combined with the receptor, they
prevent access of the endogenous mediator. The complex
between competitive antagonist and receptor is reversible.
Provided that the dose of agonist is increased sufficiently, a
maximal effect can still be obtained, i.e. the antagonism is sur-
mountable. If a dose (C) of agonist causes a defined effect when
administered alone, then the dose (C) needed to produce the
same effect in the presence of antagonist is a multiple (C/C)
known as the dose ratio (r). This results in the familiar parallel
shift to the right of the log dose–response curve, since the add-
ition of a constant length on a logarithmic scale corresponds to
multiplication by a constant factor (Figure 2.5a). β-Adrenoceptor
antagonists are examples of reversible competitive antagonists.
By contrast, antagonists that do not combine with the same
receptor (non-competitive antagonists) or drugs that combine
irreversibly with their receptors, reduce the slope of the log
dose–response curve and depress its maximum (Figure 2.5b).
Physiological antagonism describes the situation where two
drugs have opposing effects (e.g. adrenaline relaxes bronchial
smooth muscle, whereas histamine contracts it).
Fast (ms)
neurotransmitter
(e.g. glutamate)
Slow (s)
neurotransmitter
or hormone
(e.g.-adrenoceptor)
Ion channel
Direct effect (min)
on protein
phosphorylation
(e.g. insulin)
Control (hours)
of DNA/new
protein synthesis
(e.g. steroid hormones)
Cell
membrane
Cytoplasm
Second messengers
Protein
phosphorylation
Ca^2 release
Cellular effects
Nucleus
Change in
membrane
potential
GE
E
Figure 2.4:Receptors and signal transduction. G, G-protein; E, enzyme; Ca, calcium.
1 10 100
0
100
Effect (%)
AA[B] 1 A[B] 2
(a) [Agonist]
1 10 100
0
100
A
A[C] 1
A[C] 2
(b) [Agonist]
Figure 2.5:Drug antagonism. Control concentration/dose–response curves for an agonist A together with curves in the presence of (a) a
competitive antagonist B and (b) a non-competitive antagonist C. Increasing concentrations of the competitive antagonist ([B] 1 , [B] 2 )
cause a parallel shift to the right of the log dose–effect curve (a), while the non-competitive antagonist ([C] 1 , [C] 2 ) flattens the curve
and reduces its maximum (b).