BLBS102-c33 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:5 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come
33 Biochemistry of Beer Fermentation 647D’Amore T et al. 1991. Advances in the fermentation of high
gravity wort.Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention
Congress, pp. 337–344.
Day RE et al. 2002a. Characterization of the putative maltose
transporters encoded by YDL247w and YJR160c.Yeast19:
1015–1027.
Day RE et al. 2002b. Molecular analysis of maltotriose transport and
utilization bySaccharomyces cerevisiae.Appl Environ Microbiol
68: 5326–5335.
Debourg A. 2002. Yeast in action: from wort to beer.Cerevisia
27(3): 144–154.
Debourg A et al. 1990. Effets ofILVgenes doses on the flux through
the isoleucine-valine pathway inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.Ab-
stract C31, 6th International Symposium on Genetics of Industrial
Microorganisms.
Debourg A et al. 1994. Wort aldehyde reduction potential in free and
immobilized yeast systems.J Amer Soc Brew Chem52: 100–106.
Decamps C et al. 2004. Continuous pilot plant-scale immobilization
of yeast inκ-carrageenan gel beads.AIChE J50: 1599–1605.
De Groot PWJ et al. 2003. Genome-wide identification of fungal
GPI proteins.Yeast20: 781–796.
Delvaux F. 1998. Beheersing van gistingsproducten met belangrijke
sensorische eigenschappen.Cerevisia23(4): 36–45.
Depraetere SA. 2007. The potential of yeast preoxygenation for
application in the brewing industry. Doctoral dissertation, no.
751, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven, Belgium.
Depraetere SA et al. 2003. Evaluation of the oxygen requirement of
lager and ale yeast strains by preoxygenation.MBAA Tech Quart
40: 283–289.
Dequin S. 2001. The potential of genetic engineering for improved
brewing wine-making and baking yeasts.Appl Microbiol Biotech-
nol56: 577–588.
Devuyst R et al. 1991. Oxygen transfer efficiency with a view to
improvement of lager yeast performance and eer quality. Pro-
ceedings of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Lisbon,
pp. 377–384.
Dickinson JR. 1999. Carbon metabolism. In: JR Dickinson,
M Schweizer (eds.) The Metabolism and Molecular Physiol-
ogy ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Taylor & Francis, London,
pp. 23–55.
Dickinson JR et al. 1997. A^13 C nuclear magnetic resonance
investigation of the metabolism of leucine to isoamyl alco-
hol inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem272: 26871–
26878.
Dickinson JR et al. 1998. An investigation of the metabolism of
valine to isobutyl alcohol inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol
Chem273: 25751–25756.
Dickinson JR et al. 2000. An investigation of the metabolism of
isoleucine to active amyl alcohol inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.
J Biol Chem275: 10937–10942.
Dickinson JR et al. 2003. The catabolism of amino acids to long
chain and complex alcohols inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol
Chem278: 8028–8034.
Dietvorst J et al. 2005. Maltotriose utilization in lager yeast strains:
MTT1encodes a maltotriose transporter.Yeast22: 775–788.
Dietvorst J et al. 2007. Attachment ofMAL32-encoded maltase on
the outside of yeast cells improves maltotriose utilization.Yeast
24: 27–38.Dillemans M et al. 1987. The amplification effect of theILV5gene on
the production of vicinal diketones inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.
JAmSocBrewChem45: 81–85.
Duan W et al. 2004. A parallel analysis of H 2 S and SO 2 formation
by brewing yeast in response to sulphur-containing amino acids
and ammonium ions.JAmSocBrewChem62: 35–41.
Dufour J-P. 1991. Influence of industrial brewing and fermentation
working conditions on beer SO 2 levels and flavour stability. Pro-
ceedings of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Lisbon,
pp. 209–216.
Dufour J-P, Malcorps P. 1994. Ester synthesis during fermenta-
tion: enzyme characterization and modulation mechanism.Pro-
ceedings of the 4th Institute of Brewing Aviemore Conference,
Aviemore, pp. 137–151.
Duval EH et al. 2009. Microarray karyotyping of maltose-
fermentingSaccharomycesyeasts with differing maltotriose uti-
lization profiles reveals copy number variation in genes involved
in maltose and maltotriose utilization.J Appl Microbiol109:
248–259.
Ehrlich F. 1904. Uber das naturliche isomere des leucins. ̈ Berichte
der Deutschen Chemisten Gesellschaft37: 1809–1840.
Enari T-M et al. 1992. Process for accelerated beer production by
integrative expression in thePGK1orADC1genes. US Patent
5,108,925.
Engan S. 1969. Wort composition and beer flavour. I. The influence
of some amino acids on the formation of higher aliphatic alcohols
and esters.JInstBrew76: 254–261.
Engan S. 1972. Organoleptic threshold values of some alcohols and
esters in beer.JInstBrew78: 33–36.
Engan S, Aubert O. 1977. Relations between fermentation temper-
ature and the formation of some flavour components. Proceed-
ings of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Amsterdam,
pp. 591–607.
Enomoto K et al. 2002. Physiological role of soluble fumarate re-
ductase in redox balancing during anaerobiosis inSaccharomyces
cerevisiae.FEMS Microbiol Lett24: 103–108.
Federoff HJ et al. 1983a. Carbon catabolite repression of mal-
tase synthesis inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.J Bacteriol156:
301–307.
Federoff HJ et al. 1983b. Regulation of maltase synthesis inSac-
charomyces carlsbergensis.J Bacteriol154: 1301–1308.
Fraleigh S et al. 1989. Regulation of oxidoreductive yeast
metabolism by extracellular factors.J Biotechnol12: 185–198.
Francke Johannesen P et al. 1999. Construction ofS. carlsbergensis
brewer’s yeast without production of sulfite. Proceedings of the
European Brewery Convention Congress, Cannes, pp. 655–662.
Franc ̧ois J, Parrou JL. 2001. Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in
the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS Microbiol Rev25:
125–145.
Frieman MB et al. 2002. Modular domain structure in theCandida
glabrataadhesin Epa1p, aβ-1,6 glucan-cross-linked cell wall
protein.Mol Microbiol46: 479–492.
Fu Y et al. 2002.Candida albicansAls1p: an adhesin that is a
downstream effector of theEFG1filamentation pathway.Mol
Microbiol44: 61–72.
Fujii T et al. 1990. Application of a ribosomial DNA integration vec-
tor in the construction of a brewers’ yeast havingα-acetolactate
decarboxylase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 997–
1003.