Food Biochemistry and Food Processing (2 edition)

(Steven Felgate) #1

BLBS102-c33 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:5 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come


33 Biochemistry of Beer Fermentation 653

Vidgren V et al. 2009. Improved fermentation performance of a lager
yeast after repair of itsAGT1maltose and maltotriose transporter
genes.Appl Environ Microbiol75: 2333–2345.
Villaneuba KD et al. 1990. Subthreshold vicinal diketone levels
in lager brewing yeast fermentations by means ofILV5gene
amplification.J Am Soc Brew Chem48: 111–114.
Virkajarvi I, Kr ̈ ̈onlof J. 1998. Long-term stability of immobilized
yeast columns in primary fermentation.J Am Soc Brew Chem56:
70–75.
Virkajarvi I, Pohjala N. 2000. Primary fermentation with immobi- ̈
lized yeast: effects of carrier materials on the flavour of the beer.
JInstBrew106: 311–318.
Virkajarvi I et al. 1999. Effects of aeration on flavor compounds ̈
in immobilized primary fermentation.Monatschrift f ̈ur Brauwis-
senschaft52: 9–12, 25–28.
Virkajarvi I et al. 2002. Productivity of immobilized yeast reactors ̈
with very-high-gravity worts.JAmSocBrewChem60: 188–197.
Viyas VK et al. 2003. Snf1 kinases with differentβ-subunit isoforms
play distinct roles in regulating haploid invasive growth.Mol Biol
Cell23: 1341–1348.
Vunjak-Novakovic G et al. 1992. Flow regimes and liquid mixing
in a draft tube gas-liquid-solid fluidized bed.Chem Eng Sci47:
3451–3458.
Vunjak-Novakovic G et al. 1998. Air-lift reactors: research and
potential applications.Trends Chem Eng5: 159–172.
Wackerbauer K et al. 2003. Measures to improve long term stability
of main fermentation with immobilized yeast. Proceedings of the
European Brewery Convention, Dublin, pp. 445–457.
Wainwright T. 1973. Diacetyl—a review.JInstBrew79: 451–470.
Walker GM. 1998.Yeast—Physiology and Biotechnology. John Wi-
ley & Sons, Chichester.
Wang X et al. 2002. Intracellular maltose is sufficient to induceMAL
gene expression inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryot Cell1:
696–703.
Wellhoener HJ. 1954. Ein Kontinuierliches Gar- und Reifungsver- ̈
fahren fur Bier. ̈ Brauwelt94(1): 624–626.
White FH, Portno AD. 1979. The influence of wort composition on
beer ester levels. Proceedings of the European Brewery Conven-
tion Congress, Berlin, pp. 447–460.
Willaert R. 2001. Sugar consumption kinetics by brewer’s yeast
during the primary beer fermentation.Cerevisia26(1): 43–49.
Willaert R. 2007. Cell immobilization and its applications in
biotechnology: current trends and future prospects. In: EMT El-
Mansi et al. (eds.)Fermentation Microbiology and Biotechnol-
ogy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 287–361.

Willaert R, Baron GV. 1996. Gel entrapment and micro-
encapsulation: methods, applications and engineering principles.
Rev Chem Eng12: 1–205.
Willaert R et al. 2004. Diffusive mass transfer in immobilised cell
systems. In: VA Nedovic, R Willaert (eds.)Fundamentals of
Cell Immobilisation Biotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publish-
ers, Dordrecht, pp. 359–387.
Willaert R, Nedovic VA. 2006. Primary beer fermentation by immo-
bilised yeast—a review on flavour formation and control strate-
gies.J Chem Technol Biotechnol81: 1353–1367.
Yamano S et al. 1994. Construction of a brewer’s yeast hav-
ingα-acetolactate decarboxylase gene fromAcetobacter acetii
ssp.xylinumintegrated in the genome.J Biotechnol32: 173–
178.
Yamauchi Y, Kashihara T. 1995. Kirin immobilized system. EBC
Monograph XXIV, EBC Symposium on Immobilized Yeast Ap-
plications in the Brewing Industry, pp. 99–117.
Yamauchi Y et al. 1994. Beer brewing using an immobilized yeast
bioreactor design of an immobilized yeast bioreactor for rapid
beer brewing system.J Ferment Bioeng78: 443–449.
Yao B et al. 1994. Shared control of maltose induction and catabolite
repression of theMALstructural genes inSaccharomyces.Mol
Gen Genet243: 622–630.
Yoon SH et al. 2003. Specificity of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
in removing carbohydrates by fermentation.Carbohydr Res338:
1127–1132.
Younis OS, Stewart GG. 1998. Sugar uptake and subsequent es-
ter and higher alcohol production bySaccharomyces cerevisiae.
JInstBrew104: 255–264.
Younis OS, Stewart GG. 2000. The effect of wort maltose con-
tent on volatile production and fermentation performance in
brewing yeast. In: K Smart (ed.)Brewing Yeast Fermentation
and Performance, vol 1. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 170–
176.
Z ̈ahringer H et al. 2000. Induction of neutral trehalase Nth1 by
heat and osmotic stress is controlled by STRE elements and
Msn2/Msn4 transcription factors: variations of PKA effect during
stress and growth.Mol Microbiol35: 397–406.
Zastrow CR et al. 2001. Maltotriose fermentations bySaccha-
romyces cerevisiae.J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol27: 34–38.
Zheng X et al. 1994a. Transport kinetics of maltotriose in strains of
Saccharomyces.J Ind Microbiol13: 159–166.
Zheng X et al. 1994b. Factors influencing maltotriose utilization
during brewery wort fermentations.J Am Soc Brew Chem52:
41–47.
Free download pdf