generation of architects whose education was based
upon the modernist concept of the ‘architectural diagram’
and creativity developed through the medium of drawing,
painting and abstract model-making. The focus of the
investigation was upon how freehand drawing was
employed at different stages in the design process and
particularly how drawing interfaced with CAD and model-
making. The intention was to move from documentary
and explorative freehand drawing (the theme of this book)
to examine sketching in the context of architectural
practice in the twenty-first century. Inevitably, the
interviews relayed both personal experience as well as
wider perceptions of the role of freehand drawing in the
offices concerned. Four main conclusions can be drawn.
First, in the process of solving design problems the
freehand drawing is the pre-eminent tool employed. The
drawings produced are a kind of conversation acted out in
line and often integrated with words, symbols and
photographs to produce a kind of collage of design
potential. Whilst architects tend to employ different
explorative drawing techniques, they all rely upon the
freehand drawing at the initial design stage and to a
degree at subsequent stages. The first drawings are
‘thinking’ drawings or abstract diagrams, usually private
rather than shared, often produced after much inner
reflection, and generally in plan form. These initial
drawings invariably record design thoughts rather than
the thoughts following the design sketches. The diagram
can be a mere dozen lines but it contains the kernel of a
design idea and its very presence is one of the defining
25.11a and b
These sketches by Sir Nicholas Grimshaw display an interest in the
poetics of construction. They relay more intended character than a
CAD drawing. (Sir Nicholas Grimshaw)
254 Understanding architecture through drawing