The Economist - USA (2021-10-09)

(Antfer) #1
TheEconomistOctober9th 2021
Graphic detail Nobel prizes

85

Noblesse oblige


T


henobelprizes,whosewinnersare
announced  this  month  (see  Science),
may  be  the  world’s  most  coveted  awards.
As  soon  as  a  new  crop  of  laureates  is
named, critics start comparing the victors’
achievements with those of previous win­
ners, reigniting debates over past snubs.
A  full  account  of  why,  say,  Stephen
Hawking was passed over will have to wait
until  2068:  the  Nobel  Foundation’s  rules
prevent disclosure about the selection pro­
cess  for  50  years.  But  once  this  statute  of
limitations  ends,  the  foundation  reveals
who offered nominations, and whom they
endorsed.  Its  data  start  in  1901  and  end  in
1953 for medicine; 1966 for physics, chem­
istry and literature; and 1967 for peace. (The
economics prize was first awarded in 1969.)
Nomination  lists  do  not  explain  omis­
sions like Leo Tolstoy (who got 19 nomina­


tions)orMahatmaGandhi(whogot12).But
they do show that in 1901­66, Nobel voters
handed  out  awards  more  in  the  style  of  a
private  members’  club  than  of  a  survey  of
expert  opinion.  Whereas  candidates  with
lots of nominations often fell short, those
with  the  right  backers—like  Albert  Ein­
stein or other laureates—fared better.
The  bar  to  a  Nobel  nomination  is  low.
For the peace prize, public officials, jurists
and the like submit names to a committee,
chosen by Norway’s parliament, that picks
the winner. For the others, Swedish acade­
mies solicit names from thousands of peo­
ple, mostly professors, and hold a vote for
the  laureate.  On  average,  55  nominations
per year were filed for each prize in 1901­66.
Historically,  voters  paid  little  heed  to
consensus  among  nominators.  In  litera­
ture and medicine, the candidate with the
most nominations won just 11% and 12% of
the time; in peace and chemistry, the rates
were  23%  and  26%.  Only  in  physics,  at
42%, did nomination leaders have a big ad­
vantage. In 1956 Ramón Menéndez Pidal, a
linguist and historian, got 60% of nomina­
tions for the literature prize, but still lost. 
However, voters did make one group of
nominators happy: current and future lau­

reates.Candidatesputforwardbypastvic­
tors went on to win at some point in the fu­
ture 40% more often than did those whose
nominators  never  won  a  Nobel.  People
whose  nominators  became  laureates  later
on also won unusually often. This implies
that  being  accomplished  enough  to  merit
future  Nobel  consideration  was  sufficient
to gain extra influence over voters.
In theory, this imbalance could simply
reflect laureates nominating stronger can­
didates.  However,  at  least  one  Nobel  win­
ner  seems  to  have  boosted  his  nominees’
chances,  rather  than  merely  naming  su­
perstars who would have won anyway.
According  to  the  Nobel  Foundation’s
online archive, all 11 of Einstein’s nominees
won  a  prize.  Some  were  already  famous,
like  Max  Planck;  others,  like  Walther  Bo­
the,  were  lesser­known.  In  two  cases,  his
support seems to have been decisive.
In 1940 Einstein supported Otto Stern, a
physicist who had already had 60 nomina­
tions.  Stern  won  the  next  time  the  prize
was  given.  Similarly,  Wolfgang  Pauli,
whose  “exclusion  principle”  is  central  to
quantum  mechanics,  had  received 20
nominations  before  Einstein  backedhim
in 1945. He got his prize that same year.n

Nobel laureates have had extra sway
over who gets to join their club

→ Getting lots of nominations is no guarantee of a Nobel prize—unless the nominations come from other laureates

Shareofnominationsfortheliteratureprize,%

CandidatesnominatedbyAlbertEinsteinusuallywonwithina fewyears

Source:NobelFoundation*Forprizesthatweregivena yearlate,nominationsareback-datedtotheofficialyearoftheaward.Threecandidates
notshown†Ratioofprizeswonanytimeaftera nominationtothenumberexpected,if allnominatorshadequalinfluence,inyearofnomination

Post-nominationwinratio†,1901-

Prizesnotawarded

Nominator IspastNobelwinner Neverwon Nobel

Peace

Literature

Chemistry

Physics

Medicine

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1900 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

Nomination leader Winner Both

RamónMenéndezPidal
gets60%ofnominations
butstillfailstowin

Robert Frost is snubbed again,
after 31 nominations dating
back to 1950

ThomasMann,thewinnerin
199,successfullynominates
fellowGermanHermanHesse

Prizes not
awarded

Leo Tolstoy earns the most
nominations, but the prize
goes to Theodor Mommsen

WaltherBothe

WolfgangPauli

OttoStern

ErwinSchrödinger

WernerHeisenberg

CarlBosch

GustavHertz

MaxPlanck

1905 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Einstein among nominators* Ye s No Nominations 1 5 1

Won
Free download pdf