The Economist October 9th 2021 United States 43
Warfroma distance
Droning on
D
roneshavebeena commonsightin
theskiesaboveAfghanistan,butrarely
hadonetraineditsgazeonthecapital,Ka
bul.OnAugust29th,asAmericawashasti
lywithdrawingitsremainingsoldiersand
Afghanrefugeesthroughthecity’sairport,
a dronestrucka whiteToyotaCorolla.After
thestrike,GeneralMarkMilley,America’s
topmilitaryofficial,calledita “righteous”
strike, andthePentagonclaimed it had
thwartedanimminentattackonAmerican
forces.Infactnoterroristshadbeenkilled
andsevenofthetenvictimswerechildren.
PresidentJoeBidenbrokewithhisformer
boss, Barack Obama, in withdrawing
troopsfromAfghanistan.LikeMrObama,
henowfacesa choiceonhowextensively
tousedronestoreplacesoldiersandpilots.
MrBidenhaspledgedtoconduct“over
thehorizon” counterterrorism opera
tions,chieflyusingarmeddrones,inAf
ghanistan,topursueterroristswhilere
ducingthetoll ofthewar onterroron
Americans.Yet asthe experience ofMr
Obamaandhissuccessor,DonaldTrump,
suggests,dronestrikeshavehardlyproved
a strategicsuccess.AsSamuelMoynofYale
Universityarguesinhisrecentlypublished
book“Humane,” suchattemptsto make
thewarlesslethalmayhavemadeit harder
toend.MrBiden’sstrategyappearstobe
justtheformulafora moresustainable,but
nolessbrutal,waronterror.
Astroopcasualties mountedandthe
public opinion turned under President
George W. Bush, drones emerged as a
meansoflongdistancefighting.Firstde
ployedjustweeksafterSeptember11th,it
wasMrObamawhogreatlyexpandedtheir
use. The rationale was clear. America
wouldnolongerrelyonvulnerableground
forces.Dronescouldstrikeasfarafieldas
Pakistan, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia—
placeswhereAmericawasnot,officially,at
war.Killingterrorists,ratherthanseizing
theminbattle,couldalsosolvetheGuantá
namoproblem.“Ifnoonewascaptured,no
onecouldbemistreated,”writesMrMoyn.
KeentowithdrawtroopsfromIraqand,
eventually,Afghanistan,MrObamadirect
edmoredronestrikesinhisfirstyearthan
MrBushhadinhisentirepresidency.A
briefpreparedinMarchof 2009 bytheDe
partmentofJusticelaidouttheadminis
tration’scontortedlegaljustification.It de
claredthatthewaronterroroperatedona
globalbattlefield. Norwoulditbelimited
toalQaedaand“associatedforces”:even
thosewithtenuoustieslikealShababin
Somalia,werefairgame.MrMoynargues
thisgavepermissiontostriketargetsthat
didnotposean“imminent”threat,asin
ternationallawdemands.Attheheightof
Mr Obama’s drone campaign in 2010,
America’s armed forces launched 128
strikesinPakistanalone.
Despite Mr Obama’s insistence that
dronescouldpreciselytargetAmerica’sen
emies,therisingvolumeofstrikesensured
civiliancasualtiesrosealso.Withupto 560
civilian deaths in Pakistan alone from
2009 to2011,theunandcivilsocietycalled
forreform.GuidanceissuedbytheWhite
Housein 2013 attemptedtoplacelimitson
thelethalityofthedronecampaignbeyond
Afghanistan and Iraq. The document
pledgedstrikeswouldnotoccurwithouta
“nearcertainty”thatnonterroristswould
notbekilled.
Ithelpedstemtheworstexcesses:by
2016,strikescausedfewerthantencivilian
deaths in Pakistan, Somalia andYemen
combined.OnthebattlefieldinAfghani
stan,Iraq and,after2014,Syria,military
lawyerscounselledcommanders ontar
getingdecisions—abovea certainthresh
old for predicted civilian casualties, a
strike would require permission from
higher authorities.MrObama expressed
hopethatthis“legal architecture”could
ensure“anypresident’sreinedin.”
PresidentDonaldTrumpeasilydiscard
edMrObama’srulesinhisfirstyearinof
fice,givingcommandersgreaterflexibility
in choosing their targets. The tempo of op
erations rose, and their reach expanded to
new places like Niger. Nowhere was this
escalation more dramatic than in Afghani
stan, where as many as 130 civilians per
ished in strikes in 2017. Even so, their effec
tiveness is open to debate. In the two de
cades since 2001, estimates the Centre for
Strategic and International Studies in
Washington, dc, the number of Sunni Is
lamic militants grew fourfold, though
thankfully they have not pulledoff a dev
astating attack on American soil. “The as
sumption that there was no substitutabil
ity was wrong,” says Sarah Kreps of Cornell
University, with new terrorist leaders re
placing the dead.
Buzz on
Mr Biden has sought to rein in the excesses
of his predecessor and return to a more re
strained policy. While his administration
prepares new guidance, Mr Biden has re
quired the Pentagon and ciato seek White
House approval for strikes outside Afghan
istan, Iraq and Syria. But Mr Biden has no
intention of ending their use. He boasts
that even without a presence in Afghani
stan, his administration will continue to
strike terrorist organisations in Afghani
stan from the safety of America’s ships at
sea and bases in the Middle East.
Such a strategy may not prove effective,
or humane. As General Kenneth “Frank”
McKenzie, America’s top military official
in the Middle East and Central Asia, admit
ted to Congress in testimony on September
28th, longdistance drone attacks neces
sarily rely on weaker intelligence without
nearby bases and local partner forces.
More mistakes, like the August 29th strike
in Kabul, are thus likely even after the Pen
tagon completes its investigation. Ms
Kreps is not sure Americans will give
drones much mind. “Afterthedust settles,
we will still be using them.”n
WASHINGTON, DC
The president is weighing how extensively to use drones. More civilian casualties
abroad seem the likeliest outcome
Somewhere, over the horizon