QuantumPhysics.dvi
wang
(Wang)
#1
and their adjointsa† 1 anda† 2. By construction they obey canonical commutation relations
[ai,a†j] =δij fori,j= 1,2, while [a 1 ,a 2 ] = [a† 1 ,a† 2 ] = 0. Re-expressing the Hamiltonian in
terms of these oscillators, we find,
H= ̄hωB
(
a† 1 a 1 +a† 2 a 2 + 1
)
+i
eB ̄h
2 m
(
a† 1 a 2 −a† 2 a 1
)
(7.19)
Finally, we make the following orthonormal change of variables froma 1 , 2 toa±,
a±≡
1
√
2
(a 1 ±ia 2 ) (7.20)
and their conjugates. These oscillators still obey canonical commutation relations,
[ai,aj] = [a†i,a†j] = 0 [ai,a†j] =δi,j i,j= +,− (7.21)
Using the following relations (the±signs are correlated),
2 a†±a±=a† 1 a 1 +a† 2 a 2 ±i
(
a† 1 a 2 −a† 2 a 1
)
(7.22)
the Hamiltonian may be recast as follows,
H=
1
2
hω ̄ +
(
1 + 2a†+a+
)
+
1
2
̄hω−
(
1 + 2a†−a−
)
(7.23)
where the combinationsω±are defined by
ω±=ωB±
∣∣
∣∣eB
2 m
∣∣
∣∣≥ 0 (7.24)
We have now achieved our goal: the magnetic field Hamiltonian has beenexpressed in terms
of two independent harmonic oscillator variablesa,b.
To solve for the spectrum is straightforward. The ground state| 0 , 0 〉satisfiesa±| 0 , 0 〉= 0,
and the excited states are given by
|n+,n−〉=N(n+,n−) (a+)n+(a−)n−| 0 , 0 〉 n±≥ 0 (7.25)
whereNis the normalization factor. The corresponding eigenvalue is simply,
E(n+,n−) =
1
2
̄hω+(1 + 2n+) +
1
2
̄hω−(1 + 2n−) (7.26)
Two different states|n+,n−〉and|n′+,n′−〉will be degenerate provided
ω+(n′+−n+) +ω−(n′−−n−) = 0 (7.27)
Sincen±,n′±are integers, this relation can have solutions if and only ifω−/ω+isrational
(including the value 0). If this is the case, we writeω±=k±ω 0 wherek+>0 andk−≥ 0
are relatively prime integers. All states degenerate with|n+,n−〉are then given by|n++
nk−,n−−nk+〉for any integer nsuch thatn− ≥ nk+. Ifω−= 0, namelyω = 0, this
degeneracy is infinite, asncan take an infinite number of different values, while ifω−>0,
the degeneracy is necessarily finite.