QuantumPhysics.dvi

(Wang) #1

As a result, we have


|j,j− 1 〉=


1



2 j


(√

2 j 1 |j 1 ,j 1 − 1 〉⊗|j 2 ,j 2 〉+



2 j 2 |j 1 ,j 1 〉⊗|j 2 ,j 2 − 1 〉


)

(8.52)


The remaining linear combination at levelm=j−1 is given by


|j− 1 ,j− 1 〉=


1



2 j


(√

2 j 2 |j 1 ,j 1 − 1 〉⊗|j 2 ,j 2 〉−



2 j 1 |j 1 ,j 1 〉⊗|j 2 ,j 2 − 1 〉


)

(8.53)


and is the highestmvalue for the irreducible representationj−1. One may pursue this


process recursively, and find that


D(j^1 )⊗D(j^2 )=


j (^1) ⊕+j 2
j=k


D(j) (8.54)


It remains to determine the number k. One could do this directly. A convenient trick,


however, is to determinekby making sure that the dimensions work out correctly.


(2j 1 + 1)(2j 2 + 1) =


j (^1) ∑+j 2
j=k


(2j+ 1) (8.55)


Using


∑N

ℓ=0

(2j+ 1) = (N+ 1)^2 (8.56)


we readily find that


(2j 1 + 1)(2j 2 + 1) = (j 1 +j 2 + 1)^2 −k^2 ⇒ k^2 = (j 1 −j 2 )^2 (8.57)


so thatk=|j 1 −j 2 |. We recover easily the previous case wherej 2 =^12.


8.10 Systematics of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients


The above construction makes it clear that there are two ways of describing the states


of a system in which two angular momenta are added. The first is as the eigenstates of


J^21 ,J 13 ,J^22 ,J 23 , and we label these eigenstates as


|j 1 ,m 1 〉⊗|j 2 ,m 2 〉=|j 1 ,j 2 ;m 1 ,m 2 〉 (8.58)


But, alternatively, the same states may be label by the eigenvaluesof an equivalent set of


commuting observables,J^21 ,J^22 ,J^2 ,J^3 , and we label these states as


|j 1 ,j 2 ;j,m〉 (8.59)

Free download pdf