Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance

(Nora) #1
Assessing risk perception by means of ordinal models 83


  1. Corduas, M.: A study on university students’ opinions about teaching quality: a model
    based approach for clustering data. In Proceedings of DIVAGO Meeting, University of
    Palermo (2008)

  2. D’Elia, A.: A statistical modelling approach for the analysis of TMD chronic pain data.
    Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 17, 389–403 (2008)

  3. D’Elia, A., Piccolo, D.: A mixture model for preference data analysis. Comput. Stat. Data
    Anal. 49, 917–934 (2005)

  4. Godo, L., Torra, V.: On aggregation operators for ordinal qualitative information. Fuzzy
    Syst. 8, 143–154 (2000)

  5. Iannario, M.: A statistical approach for modelling Urban Audit Perception Surveys. Quad.
    Stat. 9, 149–172 (2007)

  6. Iannario, M.: A class of models for ordinal variables with covariates effects. Quad. Stat.
    10, 53–72 (2008)

  7. Iannario, M.: Dummy variables inCUBmodels. Statistica 2 (2008) in press

  8. Iannario, M., Piccolo, D.: A new statistical model for the analysis of customer satisfaction.
    Quality Technology and Quantitative Management (2009) in press

  9. King, G., Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J.: Making the most of statistical analyses: improving
    interpretation and presentation. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 44, 341–355 (2000)

  10. Loewenstein, F., Hsee, C.K., Weber, U., Welch, N., Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127,
    267–286 (2001)

  11. McLachlan, G., Krishnan, G.J.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions. Wiley, New York
    (1997)

  12. McLachlan, G., Peel, G.J.: Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York (2000)

  13. Piccolo, D.: Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quad. Stat. 8, 33–78 (2006)

  14. Piccolo, D., D’Elia, A.: A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food
    Qual. Pref. 19, 247–259 (2008)

  15. Rundmo T.: Risk perception and safety on offshore petroleum platforms Part 1: perception
    of risk. Saf. Sci. 15, 39–52 (1992)

  16. Rundmo, T.: Associations between risk perception and safety. Saf. Sci. 24, 197–209 (1996)

  17. Slimak, M.W., Dietz, T.: Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk
    Anal. 26, 1689–1705 (2006)

  18. Weber, E.U.: Personality and risk taking. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (eds.): International
    Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited
    11274–11276 (2001)

  19. Weber, E.U., Millman, R.: Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice.
    Management Science 43, 122–143 (1997)

  20. Yu D., Park, W.S.: Combination and evaluation of expert opinions characterized in terms
    of fuzzy probabilities. Ann. Nuclear Energ. 27,713–726 (2000)

Free download pdf