Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering : A Comprehensive Guide

(Darren Dugan) #1

19.2 PHYSICAL EXAMPLES OF OPERATORS


Consider first


LxLy=−^2

(
y


∂z

−z


∂y

)(
z


∂x

−x


∂z

)

=−^2

(
y


∂x

+yz

∂^2
∂z∂x

−yx

∂^2
∂z^2

−z^2

∂^2
∂y∂x

+zx

∂^2
∂y∂z

)
.

Now consider


LyLx=−^2

(
z


∂x

−x


∂z

)(
y


∂z

−z


∂y

)

=−^2

(
zy

∂^2
∂x∂z

−z^2

∂^2
∂x∂y

−xy

∂^2
∂z^2

+x


∂y

+xz

∂^2
∂z∂y

)
.

These two expressions arenotthe same. The difference between them, i.e. the


commutator ofLxandLy, is given by


[
Lx,Ly

]
=LxLy−LyLx=^2

(
x


∂y

−y


∂x

)
=iLz. (19.26)

This, and two similar results obtained by permuttingx,yandzcyclically,


summarise the commutation relationships between the quantum operators corre-


sponding to the three Cartesian components of angular momentum:


[
Lx,Ly

]
=iLz,
[
Ly,Lz

]
=iLx, (19.27)

[Lz,Lx]=iLy.

As well as its separate components of angular momentum, the total angular

momentum associated with a particular state|ψ〉is a physical quantity of interest.


This is measured by the operator corresponding to the sum of squares of its


components,


L^2 =L^2 x+L^2 y+L^2 z. (19.28)

This is an Hermitian operator, as each term in it is the product of two Hermitian


operators that (trivially) commute. It might seem natural to want to ‘take the


square root’ of this operator, but such a process is undefined and we will not


pursue the matter.


We next show that, although no two of its components commute, the total

angular momentum operator does commute with each of its components. In the


proof we use some of the properties (19.17) to (19.20) and result (19.27). We begin

Free download pdf