TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26 , 2021. THE WASHINGTON POST EZ EE E5
AMANDA ANDRADE-RHOADES FOR THE WASHINGTON POST
Laying the groundwork to fight the pandemic
These features are part of a series about the vaccine vanguard, scientists who helped create
coronavirus vaccines. B arney Graham, the architect of the spike protein found in most of the
vaccines, h olds a model of a respiratory syncytial virus p rotein in his home office in Rockville, Md.
Read more about him at wapo.st/barney_graham_vaccine.
“She was so excited, and we
didn’t know, to be honest, what
was happening or what she was
explaining, but we sensed her
enthusiasm, so we were excited,
too,” her daughter, Zsuzsanna
“Susan” Francia, recalled. “We’d
be nodding along, and we were
like, ‘Oh my gosh, fantastic,’ and
after a little while, we’d be like,
‘When are we eating dinner?’ ”
It was still relatively early in
Kariko’s decades-long quest to
turn basic biology into medicine.
The idea that fired her imagina-
tion that day in 1993 would turn
out to be a detour on an obscure
personal journey filled with awe-
inspiring ideas, careful experi-
ments, successes that went large-
ly unnoticed and the repeated
sting of rejection.
Then, the coronavirus pan-
demic catapulted the questions
Kariko had chipped away at on
the margins of molecular biology
to the red-hot center of science
and medicine. Her fierce dedica-
tion, once seen as quixotic, was
recognized as visionary. Her work
undergirds coronavirus vaccines
from Pfizer and German partner
BioNTech, and Moderna.
The vaccine effort is far bigger
than any one scientist’s dream.
When the credits roll, a constella-
tion of researchers, crisscrossing
scientific disciplines and stretch-
ing back more than half a cen-
tury, will get a mention. But
Kariko and an immunologist
named Drew Weissman whom
she met at a p hotocopier nearly
25 years ago, will be two of the
stars.
“I think she should be given
credit for saving the world,” said
Jean Bennett, a gene-therapy sci-
entist at Penn who occupied the
lab bench next to Kariko when
they were starting their careers.
Her ideas were “so ahead of her
time, she had a hard time con-
vincing people that they would
actually work. They seemed too
science fiction-y to people and
too challenging.”
Kariko failed, repeatedly, to
win the grants that would help
give her scientific independence.
It might have been easier to
temper her impatient enthusi-
asm and direct her efforts toward
more mainstream topics. But
with tenacious, almost fanatical
energy, she simply worked harder
— arriving at the lab at 6 a .m. on
weekdays and working nearly
every weekend.
Recently, Kariko, 66, has be-
come the object of pop culture
fascination, appearing on Time
magazine’s list of influential peo-
ple of the year and in People
magazine. Scholars who study
innovation discuss how her story
reveals blind spots in the scientif-
ic reward system — a tendency to
shower support on incremental,
predictable successes and not the
ideas that are so risky and out of
the box that they look impossible.
During the past few months, as
if making up for lost time, she and
Weissman have scooped up near-
ly every major award in science
and medicine, and both are con-
sidered contenders for a future
Nobel Prize.
Kariko looks at the setbacks
differently. The years without
money, fame or prestige, and the
times she brought broken-down
lab equipment home for her hus-
band to fix or saved Hungarian
pickle jars to store the ingredi-
ents for her experiments — these
were essential. She wasn’t work-
ing for anyone else’s idea of suc-
cess. She was working for herself.
Kariko remembers when, years
ago, a colleague told another
scientist, “Kati works for me.”
She spun on him.
“I don’t work for you. Do you
think that Saturday, Sunday, I a m
here for you?” Kariko asked. “I am
here for me. I am here to learn
more and understand.”
‘Hooked on the science’
Kariko grew up in a two-room
adobe house with a reed roof in
the small village of Kisujszallas in
Hungary. Her father was a butch-
er, her mother a bookkeeper.
There was no running water. No
television or refrigerator.
They had a garden. They had
pigs. Kariko watched a neighbor’s
cow give birth. She went on
excursions to a nearby forest and
remembers being curious about
birds, plants, nature.
And she was good — and fierce-
ly competitive — at science. By
eighth grade, she ranked third-
best in the country in biology.
As an undergraduate at the
University of Szeged, she worked
at the Biological Research Center
in a laboratory focused on lipo-
somes, bubbles that could be
used to encapsulate genetic ma-
terial. Hungary was behind the
Iron Curtain, where it wasn’t easy
to order laboratory ingredients.
So the scientists looked up how to
purify the phospholipids needed
KARIKO FROM E1
for their experiment. The investi-
gator who ran the lab rode his
bike to the slaughterhouse to pick
up a cow brain so they could
make their own phospholipids.
“This is the way I learned
science, always, that there is no
problem. You cannot buy some-
thing? You make it,” Kariko said.
She met her husband, Bela
Francia, at a d isco held as part of
an annual biology celebration. He
was 17, she 22. They married three
years later. In graduate school in
1978, she started working with
RNA. She wrote and defended her
PhD thesis while pregnant.
In 1985, the lab where Kariko
worked lost its funding. She
looked for an opportunity in the
United States, settling on a post-
doctoral position at Temple Uni-
versity in Philadelphia.
The family bought one-way
tickets and sold their car, smug-
gling the money inside a big
brown teddy bear with red-
rimmed eyes. A seam runs down
its back, where Kariko performed
the surgery. She keeps it in her
daughter’s childhood room to
this day.
Kariko worked at Temple for
three years. Then, she got a job in
Bethesda, Md., living there most
of the week. She would read
science papers until the library
closed at 11 p.m., then stay at a
friend’s apartment or simply
spread a s leeping bag out on the
office floor. At 6 a.m., she would
start her experiments and go for a
run.
In 1989, Kariko got a job at
Penn’s medical school, a junior
position that had the word “pro-
fessor” in the title but was off the
prestigious and secure tenure
track. She would need grants or
colleagues with extra funding to
support her work.
She worked first with cardiolo-
gist Elliot Barnathan. Together,
they showed messenger RNA
could trigger human cells to
pump out a complicated protein
on demand. It was a proof of
concept that opened the door to
an array of medical applications.
After new blood vessels are
stitched into patients for heart
bypass surgery, about 10 percent
will close during the first year,
mostly because of blood clots.
Barnathan and Kariko wanted to
pretreat the blood vessels, by
flushing through them messen-
ger RNA that encoded therapeu-
tic proteins. They hoped it would
reduce the risk of a dangerous
clot after surgery.
Bennett, the gene-therapy sci-
entist, joined Penn a few years
after Kariko and occupied a
neighboring lab bench. Bennett
had enough money to hire a
laboratory technician but not
enough to buy equipment.
Kariko recognized her plight,
Bennett said, bequeathing an old
refrigerator, “my first precious
piece of equipment.” The fridge
remains in Bennett’s lab, even
though it has broken several
times.
There weren’t many tenured
female faculty then, and the ones
Bennett knew did not have chil-
dren. When Bennett asked one if
she would take a vacation that
year, the scientist said during the
last week of August, she planned
to leave at 5 p.m. and play golf
every evening.
“I realized: This is tough. I
don’t know if I can do this. But we
both decided to put on the jets,”
Bennett said. “We ran a hand-to-
mouth campaign, but we were
both so hooked on the science.”
As a P hD in a clinical depart-
ment run by physicians with
medical degrees who saw pa-
tients, Kariko was a “second-class
citizen,” Barnathan said.
“At some point, there was not
an interest in having her get
promoted — and, in fact, she talks
about it as being demoted,” Bar-
nathan said. “It released her from
the idea she had to do this stuff to
climb the promotion scale. She
could focus on her science. But in
reality, I f elt bad, because it was
clear she was so bright and had
such good ideas.”
Kariko is blasé about the strug-
gle to balance family life with
professional struggles. She often
says Susan learned to get up, get
dressed and take care of herself.
She tears up a little remembering
how little money they had.
Susan remembers her child-
hood differently. It’s true, she
never saw her parents relax.
Spring break meant a week hang-
ing out in her mom’s lab because
there was no money for a vaca-
tion. But there was a close-knit
joy to their family — and deep
pride in one another’s work.
Francia remodeled their house
after his workday ended and built
much of their furniture. Kariko
was busy with work but found
time to cook Hungarian food and
bake chocolate cakes from
scratch. Susan would do her
homework, then hear the distinc-
tive rattle of her mother pouring
peanut M&Ms into a dish. She
would run downstairs, and they
would take a break.
Kariko was obsessed with mes-
senger RNA, but colleagues say
she also knew not to fall too
deeply in love with any specific
outcome and to learn from the
data — even when it was disap-
pointing. “Experiments never err,
your expectations do,” Kariko
likes to say, paraphrasing Leonar-
do da Vinci.
David Langer began working
with her in Barnathan’s lab while
he was a medical student. He was
impressed by Kariko’s compul-
sive energy. She would spend a
long day at work and then show
up the next morning with a stack
of new scientific papers, already
highlighted, for him to catch up
on.
Later, when he was in his
neurosurgery residency, he
learned Kariko was about to lose
her lab. He pleaded with the
neurosurgery department chair
to take her on because he wanted
to keep learning from her.
Together, Langer and Kariko
worked on the idea of delivering
messenger RNA to the blood ves-
sels of the brain. It was a potential
therapy for people suffering cer-
ebrovascular spasm, a complica-
tion after certain types of stroke,
when blood vessels spasm and
trigger secondary strokes. The
messenger RNA would deliver
the code for an enzyme that
synthesized nitric oxide, helping
to dilate blood vessels and reduce
the risk of death.
Langer respected Kariko but
also saw how her inability — or
unwillingness — to navigate the
system worked against her. The
fact she was an immigrant who
spoke with an accent, that she
was a woman in science may have
made it easier for her to be
overlooked. But more than that —
she didn’t play the game.
He recalled Kariko standing up
at a l ab meeting and making a
pointed, but accurate, critique of
data being presented by a well-
funded professor.
She was asked not to come
back, he recalled.
“She knows she’s brilliant, and
she doesn’t suffer fools,” Langer
said. “And the reality of American
research, which continues today,
is pursuit of money is high on the
list. Kate’s kind of the opposite.
Kate does nothing for money. The
reality is, she is doing the best
science she can do and she has
zero political savvy about how to
navigate this world.”
‘How did I miss that?’
In the late 1990s, Kariko met a
reserved immunologist named
Drew Weissman who wanted to
create an HIV vaccine and was
considering different technol-
ogies. She told him about messen-
ger RNA, touting its vast poten-
tial.
She offered to make messenger
RNA for one of Weissman’s exper-
iments.
“I make the RNA, that is what
I’m doing. I’m good at it,” she told
him.
When Weissman tested it in
specialized immune cells he was
interested in, he found the mes-
senger RNA triggered an inflam-
matory response — a blow for
Kariko.
“I was so sad,” she said. “How
did I miss that?”
Solving that problem would be
the beginning of what would
become a world-changing scien-
tific collaboration.
One of Kariko’s gifts as a scien-
tist, her colleagues say, is her
ability to design and execute
thoughtful experiments, includ-
ing thinking hard about the con-
trols. A control can seem like an
afterthought — a comparison run
in parallel to ensure the results
are really linked to whatever the
scientist was testing. In a v accine
trial, the control is the group of
people who receive a placebo
shot.
In Kariko’s experiments with
her lab-generated messenger
RNA, she used as a control a
naturally occurring kind of RNA,
called transfer RNA. It did not
trigger an inflammatory re-
sponse. It was a clue.
Kariko and Weissman tried
modifying their messenger RNA
chemically to mimic the transfer
RNA. They discovered that re-
placing a single letter of its four-
letter alphabet could stop the
messenger RNA from activating
the immune system and increase
tremendously the amount of pro-
tein cells produced.
They published their findings
and patented the work in 2005. A
year later, Kariko and Weissman
founded a company called
RNARx to commercialize this
modified RNA. They won a small-
business grant from the National
Institutes of Health with the idea
messenger RNA could be used to
treat anemia.
The idea was ahead of its time.
Two biotechnology companies —
BioNTech in Mainz, Germany,
and Moderna in Cambridge,
Mass. — would recognize the
potential even as RNARx strug-
gled to find investors.
As biotech interest began to
heat up outside their lab, the pair
kept working on the science. Nor-
bert Pardi, a scientist who grew
up in Kariko’s small village in
Hungary — whose grandfather
worked in the butcher shop with
Kariko’s father — had been meet-
ing with Kariko every summer
since he was in college. He came
to Penn to work with Kariko and
Weissman after he earned his
PhD.
They had solved one problem
— the immune reaction caused by
messenger RNA — but still faced
a different one. How would they
get this incredibly fragile materi-
al into the body? Pardi worked on
that.
Kariko taught him everything
she knew about RNA. Typically,
as scientists move through their
career, their labs get larger and
they spend less time running
their own experiments. But Kar-
iko didn’t have that success, and
she also loved, and was unusually
talented at, the benchwork.
“Kati taught me a lot, every-
thing, about RNA,” Pardi said.
In 2013, Kariko retired from
Penn as a senior research investi-
gator. Her academic career
looked nothing like a traditional
success. But Kariko wasn’t done.
She wanted her work to reach
patients. She joined BioNTech,
then a little-known start-up that
had never created an approved
medical product. She would live
in Mainz, Germany, for 10 months
out of the year.
“I could sit here and see the
grass growing,” Kariko said, look-
ing out on her wooded backyard
in the Philadelphia suburbs. “And
then I decided to go to Germany,
to a biotech company that didn’t
have a website, leaving my hus-
band and my family behind.
What the hell am I doing? For one
week, every night, I cried myself
to sleep.”
‘Watch the news today’
For months during the pan-
demic, Kariko would drop her
daughter cryptic hints.
“Watch the news today,” she
would tell Susan, who now works
in the biotechnology industry.
“Tomorrow, as soon as you wake
up, Google search: BioNTech.”
“I think she hung up on me
afterward: ‘I must go now, good-
bye,’ ” Susan recalled.
Susan got married last year,
and during the wedding prep, she
would try to tell her mother about
the dress she had chosen. But her
mother would interrupt to talk
about the coronavirus vaccine.
The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moder-
na vaccines both depend on the
modified RNA that Kariko and
Weissman discovered.
For years, the family joke has
been that Kariko is introduced at
meetings with an important foot-
note: Her daughter is a two-time
Olympic gold-medal rower. Then,
at a c ertain point, over the last
year and a half, things changed. A
persistent Hungarian fan kept
messaging Susan about getting
an autographed picture.
She politely reminded him she
had sent a picture already.
No, he said — he wanted an
autographed photo of her moth-
er.
[email protected]
For Katalin Kariko, a dream decades in the making
“She knows she’s
brilliant, and she
doesn’t suffer fools....
Kate does nothing for
money. The reality is,
she is doing the best
science she can do.”
David Langer
COURTESY OF KATALIN KARIKO
For more than two decades, Drew Weissman and Katalin Kariko worked shoulder-to-shoulder at the lab bench to turn messenger
RNA, the genetic instruction books that tell cells how to build proteins, into medicine.