Untitled-29

(Frankie) #1

128 Financial Management


return. Example 2.2 highlights that firms (conscious of protecting the real purchasing
power of their owners) may go for unprofitable investment projects, affecting the
shareholders wealth adversely. It underlines the significance of incorporating the inflation
factor in evaluating capital budgeting decisions, in particular for business firms interested
in real returns.
Consistency warrants that the real cost of capital should be used to discount real cash
inflows after taxes and the nominal cost of capital should be employed for
nominal CFAT. This point is illustrated in Example 2.3. The investment data of Rajiv
Company Ltd. Launching a new product and with 12 per cent cost of capital, is as
follows:

Example 2.3
Assuming an inflation rate of 5 per cent, determine NPV of the project by using both
the nominal rate of discount and the real rate of discount.
Solution
NPV Using Nominal Rate of Discount

The nominal rate of discount (n) is obtained by compounding the real rate (r) and
inflation rate (i). In equations terms, it is
(l + n) = (1 + r) (l + i)
(l + r) = (1 + n) (l + i)
or

Particular Amount
Investment Rs.7,00,000
CFAT: Year 1 5,00,000
2 4,00,000
3 2,00,000
4 1,00,000
5 1,00,000

Year CFAT (Rs.) PV factor at 0.12 Total PV (Rs.)
1 5,00,000 0.893 4,46,500
2 4,00,000 0.797 3,18,800
3 2,00,000 0.712 1,42,400
4 1,00,000 0.636 63,600
5 1,00,000 0.567 56,700
10,28,000
7,00,000

Gross present value
Less: Cash outflows
Net present value 3,28,000
Free download pdf