P1: WQS Trim: 6.125in×9.25in Top: 0.5in Gutter: 0.75in
CUUS2079-04 CUUS2079-Zafarani 978 1 107 01885 3 January 13, 2014 16:54
90 Network Models
We also have
nlim→∞
(
n− 1
d
)
=nlim→∞
(n−1)!
(n− 1 −d)!d!
=nlim→∞
((n−1)×(n−2)×···(n−d))(n− 1 −d)!
(n− 1 −d)!d!
=nlim→∞
((n−1)×(n−2)×···(n−d))
d!
≈
(n−1)d
d!
. (4.10)
We can compute the degree distribution of random graphs in the limit
by substituting Equations4.10,4.9, and4.4in Equation4.8,
nlim→∞P(dv=d)=nlim→∞
(
n− 1
d
)
pd(1−p)n−^1 −d
=
(n−1)d
d!
(
c
n− 1
)d
e−c=e−c
cd
d!
, (4.11)
which is basically thePoisson distributionwith meanc. Thus, in the limit,
random graphs generate Poisson degree distribution, which differs from the
power-law degree distribution observed in real-world networks.
Clustering Coefficient
Proposition 4.6.In a random graph generated by G(n,p), the expected
local clustering coefficient for nodevis p.
Proof.The local clustering coefficient for nodevis
C(v)=
number of connected pairs ofv’s neighbors
number of pairs ofv’s neighbors
. (4.12)
However,vcan have different degrees depending on the edges that are
formed randomly. Thus, we can compute the expected value forC(v):
E(C(v))=
∑n−^1
d= 0
E(C(v)|dv=d)P(dv=d). (4.13)