How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment

(nextflipdebug5) #1

6 Considering Interdisciplinarity and Diversity



  1. The SSRC competition aims to promote “work that is relevant to a par-
    ticular discipline while resonating across other fields”; the Society of Fellows
    is committed to “innovative interdisciplinary approaches”; and the Women’s
    Studies fellowship competition encourages “original and significant research
    about women across disciplinary, regional, and cultural boundaries.” The
    ACLS’s website simply states that “interdisciplinary proposals [for the fellow-
    ship competition] are welcome”; the anonymous social science foundation
    makes no mention of interdisciplinarity.

  2. Walzer (1983).

  3. Boltanski and Thévenot (2006); also Lamont and Thévenot (2000).

  4. Dubet (2006).

  5. The first reported mention of the term “interdisciplinarity” occurred
    in 1929. See Balsiger (2004).

  6. This definition is proposed in Fuller (1988), which builds on Bechtel
    (1986).

  7. See Brainard (2002). For data on the multiplication of publications on
    interdisciplinarity, see Jacobs (forthcoming-a).

  8. On the absence of widely agreed-on criteria to ensure quality control
    in interdisciplinary research (as opposed to disciplinary research), see Klein
    (2003; 2005); Mansilla and Gardner (2004); and Weingart (2000).

  9. Porter and Rossini (1985, 33).

  10. See in particular the special issue ofResearch Evaluation(Spring 2006)
    edited by Grit Laudel and Gloria Origgi. See also the workshop “Quality As-
    sessment in Interdisciplinary Research and Education” (2006), organized by
    Veronica Boix Mansilla, Irwin Feller, and Howard Gardner, at the American
    Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., February 8,



  11. Boix Mansilla (2006).

  12. Dialogic work carries on a continual dialogue with other works of liter-
    ature and other authors; see Bakhtin (1981).

  13. Klein (1996). In contrast, an alternative approach argues that three
    distinctive logics guide interdisciplinary research: accountability, innovation,
    and ontology. See Barry, Born, and Weszkalnys (2008); also Rhoten (2003).

  14. This point is also made by Langfeldt (2006).


Notes to Pages 203–208 / 283
Free download pdf