telecom providers to implement the necessary communica-
tions backbone for MaxFli. As a result, BATCA now has
one of the best communications infrastructures in Central
America. Gracia argued:
What I can tell you right now is that we have the best
communications infrastructure in Central America in
terms of a company. We have received people from
telecoms who say, “Look, the network capacity you
have, no one else in Central America has.” That
sounds great, though we need to make a more effec-
tive use with additional services into it. But that is
one of the challenges of implementing in different
countries for one market.
As of the summer of 2001, the Central America
implementation of MaxFli had been the most difficult
implementation to date. However, it may also have been the
most important. Neil Coupland of Ciberion summarized:
[Central America] was critical frankly. Central
America proved an awful lot of things. That
MaxFli could work for example. Not just in
another market outside of Chile. But that it could
[work]. Really [work]. In six markets simultane-
ously. Frankly, I don’t know that anyone had
thought through how difficult that would be. But it
worked, and is working still.
On the other hand, Morales summarized his con-
cerns this way:
Our business is very, very simple.... In my opinion,
until today we have a very, very simple business and
a very complicated tool. I don’t think it ought to be.
We need to balance our tool with our business.
For the Globe House, the questions to be answered
were: Is the MaxFli approach the best way to build cus-
tom-developed IT systems that can be shared by multiple
end markets? Is this the systems development approach to
replicate for future multinational systems that embody a
business change initiative? Or are the needs of end markets
unique enough to demand a more locally tailored solution?
Case Study IV-6 • The Challenges of Local System Design for Multinationals 659