10 Leaders TheEconomistNovember6th 2021
G
lobal bondmarkets are wakeningfroma longslumber.The
Federal Reserve this week said it will winddownitsvast
bondbuying programme. At the same time, bondinvestorsare
reacting to higher inflation: across a group of 35 economies,five
year bond yields have risen by an average of 0.65percentage
points in the past three months. A shakeout is takingplacenot
only in emerging markets but also in rich countriessuchasAus
tralia and Britain (see Finance & economics section).Sudden
moves inevitably spark fears of market turmoil,alongthelines
of the “taper tantrum” in 2013. However, the bondshifttaking
place today is actually very different.
Before the pandemic interest rates across the worldwerelow,
reflecting dormant inflation. When the coronavirusstruckal
most two years ago, most central banks prom
ised to keep their policy rates lower for longer to
help the recovery. Many also agreed to buy
bonds, reducing their yields.
The main reason for the sudden shift today
is rising inflation. Among the 38 economies
that are members of the oecd, a club of rich
countries, inflation rose to an uncomfortable
4.6% year on year in September. Soaring energy
and food prices are only part of the story: even if you strip those
out, the figure was 3.2%, the highest in almost two decades.
For months central banks have said that high inflation is a
blip caused by temporary constraints in supply. But the action in
bond markets shows that investors reckon central banks are act
ing too slowly. Some monetary authorities have already tight
ened policy. Brazil announced a 1.5percentagepoint rate rise
last week. Central banks in Canada and Australia have aban
doned forecasts that said rates would stay low. As we write, the
Bank of England is due to decide whether to raise rates. Some
policymakers are standing firm: Christine Lagarde, the boss of
the European Central Bank, has insisted that it is “very unlikely”
to raise interest rates next year. Thespectreofcentralbanksdivergingfrommarkets,andof
consequentswingsinmarketinterestrates,willunsettlethose
withmemoriesof2013,whentheFedclumsilyrevealeditsunex
pectedintentiontobeginscalingbackitsprogrammeofbond
purchases.Theresultingglobalminipanicdentedgrowthand
clobberedsomeemergingeconomies,particularlythosewith
bigdollardebts.
Yetthisisnot2013.Onedifferenceisthattheshiftinbond
marketsismorenuanced.Theincreasesofarinnominalfive
yeargovernmentbondyieldsinAmerica,forexample,isless
thanhalfwhatitwaseightyearsago.Realbondyields,afterac
countingforexpectedinflation,areminus1%,stillwithinspit
tingdistanceofrecordlows.Thatwillsupporteasyconditions
intherealeconomy.Andevenasshorterterm
governmentbondyieldsrise,therehasbeen
muchlessofa moveinlongertermbonds.
Theotherdifferencetodayistheabsenceof
financial panic. A rising cost of debt can cause
defaults and capital flight. But many emerging
economies have healthy foreignexchange re
serves, making them resilient. Equity markets
show no sign of distress—share prices hit a re
cord high this week. Shares in banks are up by 28% this year, be
cause gradually rising interest rates can boost their profits. And
bond markets remain open for business. In October emerging
markets outside China issued nearrecord levels of corporate
and sovereign debt.
No cause for alarm, then. Markets are betting that central
banks need to bring interestrate rises forward, not that they will
lose control of inflation. Still, it is worth bearing in mind the ex
traordinarily difficult task that central banks face. During the
unpredictable tail end of a pandemic, they must try to normalise
ultraloose monetary policy amid skyhigh asset prices, heavy
debt levels and abovetarget inflation. Taper tantrum2.0is not
yet under way. But don’t rule out a bigger bond brawl.nThe message fromthenewlyrousedfixed-incomemarketsGovernment bonds
Two-year yields, 2021, % CanadaUS1.0.0
May JulJun Aug Sep OctNovAustralia
BritainBond traders stir
Markets and inflationT
he factsare damning. Owen Paterson, a former Tory Cab
inet minister now on the backbenches, was paid £9,
($12,700) a month for consulting work by two companies, one
and a half times his parliamentary salary. And, sure enough, he
earned his keep by lobbying ministers and officials on their be
half. The commissioner for standards, an independent officer,
concluded that he had brought Parliament into disrepute.
Its crossparty standards committee recommended a 30day
suspension. But on November 3rd, in a scheme cooked up barely
24 hours earlier, Tory mps voted, under instruction from the
government, to sidestep the whole sleazy mess by creating a newcommittee to examine the way mps are overseen. Mr Paterson’s
case will thus be reconsidered. It was as if an appellate court had
found a guilty verdict legally correct but unpalatable, and decid
ed to change the law rather than pass sentence.
Mr Paterson’s defenders argued not on substance but on pro
cedures, which they said were unfair, even though Parliament
wrote them and could have changed them at any time in the
past. Some said he had been treated more harshly because he
was a Conservative and a Brexiteer—the standards committee is
chaired by a (respected) Labour mp. Yet Mr Paterson blatantly
broke the rules. This week’s vote compounded his offences by alBoris Johnson treats checks and balances with contemptAre rules for losers?
Government in Britain