The Econmist - USA (2021-11-06)

(Antfer) #1
TheEconomistNovember6th 2021 BriefingSocialmobilityinAmerica 19

to50%(seechartonthenextpage).
Thatremarkabledropisdowntoa few
long­runningtrends,especiallytheemer­
genceofeducationasthedifferentiatorbe­
tweeneconomicprecarityandsuccess.Na­
tionalstatistics showthatworkerswith
collegedegreesnowhaverealwages86%
higher than those of workers without.
Whatismore,thosewithouta degreehave
seenlittleincreaseinrealwagessince1979.
Manyless­educatedmenhavedropped
outofthelabourforce.In 2016 “onlyone­
in­twoless­skilledmeninruralAmerica
worked,whichwas 15 percentagepoints
lowerthaninmetroareas,”writesJames
Ziliak,aneconomistattheUniversityof
Kentucky.Realwagesthathavenotbudged
andlowerwork­force participationhave
gonehandinhandwithillhealth,which
worsensoutcomesfurther.AnneCaseand
AngusDeatonofPrincetonUniversityre­
centlypublishedresearchshowingthatthe
life expectancy ofAmericans without a
bachelor’sdegreeisfalling.
Ontopofthisprecipitousdeclineinab­
solutemobilitytherehavealsobeenlosses
inrelativemobility,a measurecomparing
children’spositionintheincomedistribu­
tionwiththatoftheirparents.Consider
thechancefora childborntoparentsinthe
bottomfifthoftheincomedistributionto
makeittothetopfifth.Ina societywhere
originsdidnotmatteronewouldexpect
thelikelihoodofsucha ragstorichesas­
centtobeclosetorandomchance,or20%.
InAmericathechanceisjust7.5%.
Comparisons with other countries
make this look particularly pernicious.
Thelandofopportunityisbadlyoutpaced
byEuropeanwelfarestatessuchasBritain,
FranceandSweden(wherethechanceis
above11%)andalsobyCanada.


Intergenerationaldisadvantageisespe­
ciallystarkforblackAmericans—theyhave
onlyhalfasgooda chanceofescapingfrom
thebottomfifthaspoorwhitesdo.Onein
five black Americans is from a family
whichhasbeenmiredinthebottomfifth
ofincomedistributionforthreegenera­
tions;forwhitesit isjustoneina hundred.
Thosebornrichin America,by con­
trast,aremuchlikelierto stayrichthan
theircounterpartsinotheradvancedcoun­
tries.Theirchildrenseehigherincomes,
too.Hereditarypersistenceinincomesisa
measure ofhow much you can predict
about two people’sincomes based ona
comparisonofwhattheirfathersearned.
BhashMazumder,aneconomistattheFed­
eral ReserveBank ofChicago,calculates
thatifanAmerican’sfathermadetwiceas
muchashisneighbour’sfather,thenhe
wouldbeexpectedtomake60%morethan
hisneighbour.Thatismuchhigherthanif
theywereFrench(41%),German(32%) or
Danish(15%),thoughlessthanif theywere
Brazilians(70%).

Wegottagetoutwhilewe’reyoung
Becausechildrenmustgrowupandenter
thelabourmarketbeforetheirrelativeper­
formancecan be assessed,findings like
these are inevitably backwards looking;
themostrecentdataprovidedbystudiesof
intergenerational mobility come from
adultsborninthe1980sandenteringthe
labourmarketinthe2000s.Fewexperts,
though,imaginethatthetrendtolowerso­
cialmobilitywillturnouttohavereversed
forlatercohorts.Atbestitmayhavepla­
teaued;it couldwellhaveworsened.
Thereturnstohighereducation—and,
conversely, thepenaltiesforlow educa­
tion—show littlesignof declining.And

highly educated people are likely to be
marriedtoeachother,toraisechildrenin
stable marriages, to live near excellent
schoolsandtoinvesta lotinsupplement­
ingtheirchildren’seducation.MilesCo­
rak,anexpertonsocialmobility,argues
thatrisinginequalityalongthesedimen­
sions“willmostlikelylowerthedegreeof
intergenerational earnings mobility for
thenextgenerationofAmericanscoming
ofageina morepolarisedlabourmarket”.
Onewayoftryingtoseewhetherthings
aremerelybadorgettingworseistolook
fora leadingindicatorofsocialmobility.
Someeconomiststhinkthatthiscanbe
providedbyinequalitylevels,thoughthe
matterisfarfromsettled.A chartknownas
theGreatGatsbycurveshowsanempirical
link, with countries where income in­
equalityishighgoingontohavelowrates
ofsocialmobility.Thesamepatternhas
beenobservedwithinAmerica,too.States
withhighlevelsofinequality alsohave
worsemobilityoutcomes.
Themostinnovativerecentresearchon
this comes from Raj Chetty, Nathaniel
Hendren, Patrick Kline and Emmanuel
Saez.Theyuseddatafrommillionsoftax
returnstoproducea high­resolutionim­
ageofmobilityoutcomes(seemap).This
uncoveredwidevariationwithincities;the
amountofsocialmobilitycandependon
the neighbourhood, or even the block,
wherepeoplelive.Butit remainedinverse­
ly related to inequality. Other factors—
suchasmorestablefamilystructure,bet­
terschools,lowersegregation—werecor­
relatedwithhigherupwardmobility.
Inequality is,unsurprisingly,particu­
larlypersistentamongblackAmericans.In
September the Census Bureau reported
thatthetypicalincomeforwhitehouse­
holds in 2020 was61% higherthan for
blackhouseholds—agapwhichhasbarely
changedsince1967,whenthedataseries
began.Theblack­whitewealthgapisun­
changedaswell,ata ratioofonetoten.
Iftherelationshipbetweeninequality
andsocialmobilityiscausal,ratherthan
justcorrelational,itaugursillfortoday’s
youngAmericans.Since 1989 theFederal
Reservehasputoutquarterlydataonthe
distributionofnationalwealth.Itsmost
recentrelease,forthesecondquarterof
2021,showedforthefirsttimethatthetop
1%ofearners heldmorewealththanthe
middle60%.DatafromtheCongressional
BudgetOfficeshowthattheshareofna­
tionalincometakenhomebythemiddle
60%ofearnersinAmericahasfallen,and
thattakenbythetop20%ofearnershas
risen.In 1979 themiddle60%tookhome
50.8%,aftertaxesandtransfers.In 2018
thatsharehadfallento45.1%—andthetop
20%hadgoneupto49%ofthetake.
Nocountrycanrealistically aspireto
theabsoluteequalityofopportunitythat
wouldliftsocialmobilitytoitstheoretical

Source:opportunityatlas.org *Bottomquartile †Basedonhouseholdincomeatage35,forallchildrenborn, 2014-

Go mid-west, young man
Adult outcomes for children born to low-income parents*
By commuting zone

Share in top 2% of national income, % of total†

3 5 7 11
Median

.   

13 15 20 30
Free download pdf