108156.pdf

(backadmin) #1

110 Mathematics for Finance


provided that the determinant in the denominator is non-zero. The weights
depend linearly onμV.


Proof


Here we need to find the minimum of (5.16) subject to two constraints (5.14)
and (5.15). We take


G(w,λ,μ)=wCwT−λuwT−μmwT,

whereλandμare Lagrange multipliers. The partial derivatives ofGwith
respect to the weightswiequated to zero give a necessary condition for a
minimum, 2wC−λu−μm= 0, which implies that


w=

λ
2

uC−^1 +

μ
2

mC−^1.

Substituting this into the constraints (5.14) and (5.15), we obtain a system of
linear equations


1=

λ
2 uC

− (^1) uT+μ
2 uC
− (^1) mT,
μV=
λ
2
mC−^1 uT+
μ
2
mC−^1 mT,
to be solved forλandμ. The asserted formula follows by substituting the
solution into the expression forw.


Example 5.10


(3 securities) Consider three securities with expected returns, standard devia-
tions of returns and correlations between returns


μ 1 =0. 10 ,σ 1 =0. 28 ,ρ 12 =ρ 21 =− 0. 10 ,
μ 2 =0. 15 ,σ 2 =0. 24 ,ρ 23 =ρ 32 =0. 20 ,
μ 3 =0. 20 ,σ 3 =0. 25 ,ρ 31 =ρ 13 =0. 25.

We arrange theμi’s into a one-row matrixmand 1’s into a one-row matrixu,


m=

[

0 .10 0.15 0. 20

]

, u=

[

111

]

.

Next we compute the entriescij=ρijσiσjof the covariance matrixC,and
find the inverse matrix toC,


C∼=



0. 0784 − 0 .0067 0. 0175

− 0. 0067 0 .0576 0. 0120

0. 0175 0 .0120 0. 0625


,C−^1 ∼=



13. 954 2. 544 − 4. 396

2 .544 18. 548 − 4. 274

− 4. 396 − 4 .274 18. 051


Free download pdf