108156.pdf

(backadmin) #1

  1. Forward and Futures Contracts 131


Next, suppose that a stock pays dividends continuously at a raterdiv>0,
called the (continuous)dividend yield. If the dividends are reinvested in the
stock, then an investment in one share held at time 0 will increase to become
erdivTshares at timeT.(The situation is similar to continuous compounding.)
Consequently, in order to have one share at timeTwe should begin with e−rdivT
shares at time 0. This observation is used in the arbitrage proof below.


Theorem 6.3


The forward price for stock paying dividends continuously at a raterdivis


F(0,T)=S(0)e(r−rdiv)T. (6.6)

Proof


Suppose that
F(0,T)>S(0)e(r−rdiv)T.


In this case, at time 0



  • enter into a short forward contract;

  • borrow the amountS(0)e−rdivTto buy e−rdivTshares.


Between time 0 andTcollect the dividends paid continuously, reinvesting them
in the stock. At timeTyou will have 1 share, as explained above. At that time



  • sell the share forF(0,T),closing out the short forward position;

  • payS(0)e(r−rdiv)Tto clear the loan with interest.


The final balanceF(0,T)−S(0)e(r−rdiv)T >0 will be your arbitrage profit.
Now suppose that
F(0,T)<S(0)e(r−rdiv)T.


If this is the case, then at time 0



  • take a long forward position;

  • sell short a fraction e−rdivTof a share investing the proceedsS(0)e−rdivT
    risk free.


Between time 0 andTyou will need to pay dividends to the stock owner, raising
cash by shorting the stock. Your short position in stock will thus increase to 1
share at timeT. At that time



  • buy one share forF(0,T) and return it to the owner, closing out the long
    forward position and the short position in stock;

  • receiveS(0)e(r−rdiv)Tfrom the risk-free investment.


Again you will end up with a positive amountS(0)e(r−rdiv)T−F(0,T)>0,
contrary to the No-Arbitrage Principle.

Free download pdf