Legal Dissent: Constitutional Proposals for “Cambio” in Cuba 157
ment-supported solution and substantial amounts of capital. Of the
Varela Project’s proposals, the most appealing one is likely to be the
freedom to organize a company, given its potential impact on individ-
ual economic conditions.
The appearance in the 2008 Freedom House survey of the “single
currency” as a top priority issue reflects the fact that a simple, eco-
nomic message can make quick inroads because of its immediate daily
relevance. The “Con la Misma Moneda” (With the Same Currency)
campaign was launched in 2006 by the Federación Latinoamericana de
Mujeres Rurales (FLAMUR) (Rodriguez Albacia 2006). Following the
Varela Project model, FLAMUR is collecting 10,000 signatures under
Article 88.ch.4 of the Constitution to request that the National
Assembly consider the consolidation of Cuba’s two currencies—the
Cuban peso (CUP, used by Cuban citizens) and the Convertible Peso
(CUC, linked to foreign currencies) into one, equally valid currency
(Rodriguez Albacia 2006). This issue has a direct impact on men and
women’s pockets. The domestic CUC/CUP exchange rate is about
1:25, with the government imposing a 20% tax per exchange
(González-Corzo 2006; oanda.com).
The recurrence in surveys of the embargo as an issue of “eco-
nomic isolation” has an equally powerful psychological aspect. This
TABLE 1. Comparison of Top Priorities of MCL and Surveyed Populations
# The Varela Proj-
ect (2002)
Solidaridad
Española (2005)
IRI#1 (2007) IRI#2 (2008) Freedom House
(2008)
1amnesty for
political prison-
ers
low salaries/
cost of living/
lack of job
(30.5%)
low salaries/
high cost of life
(43.1%)
low salaries/
high cost of life
(42.5%)
freedom of
movement
(inside & out-
side Cuba)
2freedom of
speech
isolation/the
embargo
(25.9%)
lack of liberty/
political system
(18.2%)
the country’s
double cur-
rency (13.1%)
a single cur-
rency system
3freedom of
association
food (14.6%) food shortages
(11.6%)
lack of liberty/
political system
(8.9%)
freedom of
expression
4freedom to
organize corpo-
rations
transportation
(9.6%)
no problem
(6.3%)
the embargo/
isolation (8.5%)
5a new electoral
law/free elec-
tions
housing (6.7%) embargo/isola-
tion (4.8%)
food shortages
(6.8%)