transmission among native Chinese masters. The Chan
list of Indian patriarchs was conventionally fixed at
twenty-eight in the Baolin chuan(Transmission of the
Treasure Grove), completed in 801 (see Table 2).
Only two points separate Chan’s assertion of lineage
succession from the earlier Tiantai one. Vasumitra is
inserted as seventh in the line of patriarchal succession,
a claim based on the appearance of his name in the
Chanjing,mentioned above. The addition of Vasumi-
tra effectively expands the Tiantai list from twenty-
three to twenty-four. More significantly, the Chan list
maintains that the transmission was suspended with
Simha bhiksu,as the Tiantai list had supposed, but
continued on and was eventually brought physically to
China in the person of BODHIDHARMA(ca. early fifth
century). This assertion was made to lend credence to
the claim that Chan represented the unbroken succes-
sion of Buddhist teaching from S ́akyamuni to a series
of Chinese patriarchs, including the undisputed list of
six masters from Bodhidharma to HUINENG(638–713)
(see Table 3).
The assertion of a Chinese patriarchal tradition pro-
voked a well-known dispute over correct lineal suc-
cession among rival Chan factions. The dispute began
in 732 when a hitherto obscure monk named Shenhui
(684–758) attacked the legitimacy of the imperially ac-
knowledged representatives of Chan. In 701 or 702, an
illustrious disciple of Hongren, Shenxiu (ca. 606–706),
had been invited to court by Empress Wu, where he
was received with great acclaim. Following Shenxiu’s
death, his disciples Puji (d. 739) and Yifu (d. 736) be-
came the standard bearers of Chan at the imperial
court. Until the arrival of Shenhui, Shenxiu was the
undisputed sixth patriarch of Chan. Shenhui chal-
lenged that the true heir of Hongren’s dharma had
been his own master, Huineng, and that he himself was
Huineng’s heir. To substantiate his claim, Shenhui in-
sisted Bodhidharma’s robe, the symbol of legitimate
transmission, had been passed by Hongren to
Huineng, not Shenxiu. Shenhui branded Shenxiu’s il-
legitimate Chan the “Northern school,” in contrast to
the legitimate “Southern school” teaching of his own
master, Huineng. Over time, Shenhui’s arguments
gained favor and Huineng was officially accepted as the
sixth patriarch in 816. All subsequent Chan factions
traced their lineage through Huineng.
Chan and Tiantai lineage formation culminated in
the Song dynasty (960–1279). While early Chan in-
sisted on a single line of orthodox transmission
through the sixth patriarch and accepted collateral lin-
eages only with reluctance, the later tradition recog-
nized multilineal branches. Fueled by the geographical
spread of Chan throughout China, numerous groups
sought legitimacy by tracing their lineage of patriarchs
through Huineng. After Huineng, the principal or
“trunk” lineage of Chan was presumed to bifurcate,
and several branch lineages flourished. The bifurcation
posited that all later Chan lineages were descended
through two of Huineng’s disciples, Nanyue Huairang
(677–744) and Qingyuan Xingsi (d. 740). Huairang
linked the flourishing movement of Mazu DAOYI
(709–788) and his followers in the late eighth and early
ninth centuries to the Chan tradition of Huineng, and
it is clear that Huairang’s record was tailored to legit-
imize these motivations. Xingsi’s record was conceived
LINEAGE
á i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Á i
á
á
á
á
á
Á
Chan lineage based on the Baolin chuan (Transmission
of the Treasure Grove)
Sakyamuni
- Mahakasyapa
- Ananda
- Sanavasa
- Upagupta
- Dhrtaka
- Miccaka
- Vasumitra
- Buddhanandin
- Buddhamitra
- Parsva
- Punyayasas
- Asvaghosa
- Kapimala
- Nagarjuna
15. Kanadeva
16. Rahulata
17. Sanghanandin
18. Gayasata
19. Kumarata
20. Jayata
21. Vasubandhu
22. Manorhita
23. Haklenayasas
24. Simha bhiksu
25. Basiasita
26. Punyamitra
27. Prajñatara
28. Bodhidharma
SOURCE: Author.
TABLE 2
Lineage of early Chinese Chan patriarchs and their
connection to the "Five Houses"
- Bodhidharma
- Huike
- Sengcan
- Daoxin
- Hongren
- Huineng
- Huairang
- Mazu
I. Linji II. Weiyang
- Xingsi
- Shitou
III. Yunmen IV. Caodong V. Fayan
SOURCE: Author.
TABLE 3