Chapter 9 Directed graphs & Partial Orders248
So
1! f 1 g
3! f1;3g
4! f1;4g
6! f1;3;6g
8! f1;4;8g
12! f1;3;4;6;12g
So, the fact that 3 j 12 corresponds to the fact thatf1;3gf1;3;4;6;12g.
In this way we have completely captured the weak partial orderby the subset
relation on the corresponding sets. Formally, we have
Lemma 9.7.2.Letbe a weak partial order on a set,A. Thenis isomorphic to
the subset relation,, on the collection of inverse images under therelation of
elementsa 2 A.
We leave the proof to Problem 9.14. Essentially the same construction shows
that strict partial orders can be represented by sets under the proper subset relation,
. To summarize
Theorem 9.7.3.Every weak partial order,, is isomorphic to the subset relation,
, on a collection of sets.
Every strict partial order,, is isomorphic to the proper subset relation,, on a
collection of sets.
9.8 Path-Total Orders
The familiar order relations on numbers have an important additional property:
given two different numbers, one will be bigger than the other. Partial orders with
this property are said to bepath-total orders.^7
Definition 9.8.1.LetRbe a binary relation on a set,A, and leta;bbe elements of
A. Thenaandbarecomparablewith respect toRiffŒa R b ORb R aç. A partial
(^7) Path-total partial orders are conventionally just called “total.” But this terminology conflicts with
the definition of “total relation,” and it regularly confuses students. So we chose the terminology
“path-total” to avoid the confusion.
Being a path-total partial order is a much stronger condition than being a partial order that is a
total relation. For example, any weak partial order such asis a total relation but generally won’t be
path-total.