History of the Christian Church, Volume I: Apostolic Christianity. A.D. 1-100.

Pop. Com. 1883). Comp. also the corresponding sections in the works on the Apostolic Age

mentioned in §20, and my H. Ap. Ch. pp. 348–377.

II. Apocryphal sources: Εὐαγγέλιον κατὰ Πέτρον οφ Εβιονιτε οριγιν, Κήρυγμα Πέτρου , Πράξεις

Πέτρου, Ἀποκάλυψις Πέτρου, Περίοδοι Πέτρου(Itinerarium Petri), Πράξεις τῶν ἁγίων

ἀποστόλων Πέτρου καὶ Παύλου(Acta Petri et Pauli). See Tischendorf’s Acta Apost. Apocr

1–39, and Hilgenfeld’s Novum Testamentum extra canonem receptum (1866), IV. 52 sqq. The

Pseudo-Clementine "Homilies" are a glorification of Peter at the expense of Paul; the,

"Recognitions" are a Catholic recension and modification of the "Homilies." The

pseudo-Clementine literature will be noticed in the second Period.

III. Special works on Peter:

E. Th. Mayerhoff: Historisch-Kritische Einleitung in die Petrinischen Schriften. Hamb. 1835.

Windischmann (R. C.): Vindiciae Petrinae. Ratisb. 1836.

Stenglein (R. C.): Ueber den 25 jahrigen Aufenthalt des heil. Petrus in Rom. In the "Tübinger

Theol. Quartalschrift," 1840.

J. Ellendorf: 1st Petrus in Rom und Bishof der römischen Gemeinde gewesen? Darmstadt, 1841.

Transl. in the "Bibliotheca Sacra," Andover, 1858, No. 3. The author, a liberal R. Cath., comes

to the conclusion that Peter’s presence in Rome can never be proven.

Carlo Passaglia (Jesuit): De Praerogativis Beati Petri, Apostolorum Principis. Ratisbon, 1850.

Thomas W. Allies (R. C.): St. Peter, his Name and his Office as set forth in Holy Scripture. London,

1852. Based upon the preceding work of Father Passaglia.
      Bernh. Weiss: Der Petrinische Lehrbegriff. Berlin, 1855. Comp. his Bibl. Theol. des N. T, 3d ed.
      1880, and his essay,Die petrinische Frage in "Studien und Kritiken," 1865, pp. 619–657, 1866,
      pp. 255–308, and 1873, pp. 539–546.
      Thos. Greenwood: Cathedra Petri. Lond., vol. I. 1859, chs. I and II. pp. 1–50.
      Perrone (R. C.):S. Pietro in Roma. Rome, 1864.
      C. Holsten (of the Tübingen School): Zum Evangelium des Paulus und des Petrus. Rostock, 1868.
      R. A. Lipsius: Die Quellen der röm. Petrussage. Kiel, 1872. By the same: Chronologie der röm
      Bischöfe. Kiel, 1869. Lipsius examines carefully the heretical sources of the Roman Peter-legend,
      and regards it as a fiction from beginning to end. A summary of his view is given by
      Samuel M. Jackson: Lipsius on the Roman Peter-Legend. In the "Presbyterian Quarterly and
      Princeton Review" (N. York) for 1876, pp. 265 sqq.
      G. Volkmar: Die römische Papstmythe. Zürich, 1873.
      A. Hilgenfeld: Petrus in Rom und Johannes in Kleinasien. In his "Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche
      Theol." for 1872. Also his Einleitung in das N. T., 1875, pp. 618 sqq.
      W. Krafft: Petrus in Rom. Bonn, 1877. In the "Theol. Arbeiten des rhein. wissenschaftl.
      Predigervereins, " III. 185–193.
      Joh. Friedrich (Old Cath.): Zur ältesten Gesch. des Primates in der Kirche. Bonn, 1879.
      William M. Taylor: Peter the Apostle. N. York, 1879.
      The congregation of Jerusalem became the mother church of Jewish Christianity, and thus of
      all Christendom. It grew both inwardly and outwardly under the personal direction of the apostles,
      chiefly of Peter, to whom the Lord had early assigned a peculiar prominence in the work of building
      his visible church on earth. The apostles were assisted by a number of presbyters, and seven deacons
      or persons appointed to care for the poor and the sick. But the Spirit moved in the whole

A.D. 1-100.