The Economist November 13th 2021 UnitedStates 37
nuclearpowerbecauseof the promise of
renewables, such as wind and solar, and
the growth of “community choice aggrega
tors”, which allow local municipalities to
decide where they get their power from.
Three things have changed since then.
First, California passed SB100 in 2018,
which requires the state to achieve 100%
cleanpower generation by 2045. Second,
the southwest is suffering from what pa
leoclimatologists think is its secondworst
megadrought in 1,200 years. Reservoirs
across the region are drying up, limiting
the supply of hydroelectric power. Just 11%
of California’s instate power generation
came from hydro in 2020, a 44% drop from
2019 (see chart). Electricity from cleanen
ergy sources (including nuclear) made up
51% of California’s power generation last
year, down from 57% in 2019.
Third, a heatwave in August of 2020 led
to rolling blackouts across the state as de
mand for electricity (to power aircondi
tioners) outpaced supply. California’s pub
lic utilities commission is scrambling to
meet increased demand. The regulator re
cently ordered utility companies to buy up
renewable energy and battery storage to try
to offset the impending loss of Diablo.
These three trends led researchers to
ponder how keeping the plant running
might change California’s energy outlook.
They found that to keep it going to 2035,
ten years past its current operating licence
issued by the nrc, would cut emissions,
bolster the grid’s reliability and save the
state $2.6bn. The analysis shows that Dia
blo’s continued operation would reduce
the carbon emissions from power genera
tion by 11% each year from 2017 levels. And
unlike wind and solar power, nuclear ener
gy provides a stable source of electricity
unaffected by changes in weather.
The researchers also suggest that Diablo
could potentially help California make its
power sector greener and tackle water
shortages by producing hydrogen or po
weringasaltwaterdesalinationplantin
addition to generating electricity. “You
cannotaffordtotaketechnologysolutions
off the table” when pursuing netzero
goals,saysJacopoBuongiorno,oneofthe
authorsanda nuclearscientistatmit. “All
oftheaboveisreallythebeststrategy.”
ItisonethingtoproveDiablo’svalue,
andquiteanothertoreverseitsretirement.
Alawaimedatprotectingmarineecosys
temswouldforcetheplanttoreplaceits
waterintakesystem,whichcoolsitsreac
tors,witha newsystemthatreducesthein
takeflowrateby93%.Itwouldalsorequire
PG&etoreopenits 2018 settlementandre
licensetheplant,whichcanbeanonerous
process;orsellDiablotoanotherutility.
Fissionimpossible?
ThedebateoverDiabloCanyonreflectsthe
recentrebrandingofnuclear.SteveNesbit,
presidentoftheAmericanNuclearSociety,
saysthreethingshappenedinthe2000sto
puta damperonnuclearpowerinAmerica:
fracking took off,the financial crisisof
200708 lesseneddemand for electricity
andtheFukushimaaccidentspookedpoli
ticians. The plants that were commis
sionedweredelayedandoverbudget.Yet
evidenceshowsthatwhennuclearreactors
shutdown,pollutingfossilfuelsmakeup
thedifference.
Evenwhileplantsarebeingshutdown,
nuclearpowerisgaininginappeal.Envi
ronmentalgroupshavelongbeensceptical
ofnuclearbecauseofthetoxicwasteit pro
duces,orbecausetheywereagainstnuc
learweapons.JessicaLovering,thefoun
derofGoodEnergyCollective,whichaims
tobuildthe“progressivecasefornuclear
energy”,saystoday’sclimateactivistsare
morepragmatic,andfocusedonnuclear’s
lack ofcarbon emissions. Shecites the
SunriseMovementasa groupthatisnot
necessarily pronuclear, but is against
closingdownexistingplants.
Nuclearisresponsiblefornearly20%of
America’spowergenerationandabouthalf
ofitscleanenergy.A surveyfromecoAmer
icafoundthat56%ofDemocratssupported
nuclearpower in2020,upfrom37%in
- “Young people these days maybe
don'tbringwiththemthebaggageoftheir
parentsandgrandparents,whowereraised
duringthecoldwar,intheirviewofnuc
learpower,”saysMrNesbit.
Policyisslowlycatchingup.Pronuc
leargroupspointtotheuseof“cleanelec
tricity”or“zerocarbon”languageinstate
andfederalclimatetargetsasa waytoleave
thedooropenfornuclear,ratherthanre
quiring renewables. Jennifer Granholm,
PresidentJoeBiden’senergysecretary,told
a crowdatCOP26,theglobalclimatecon
ferenceinGlasgow,thatnuclearenergyis
an“essential tool” in decarbonisingthe
grid.RepublicansandDemocratsalikeare
excitedaboutthepotentialforconverting
coal plantsinto nuclear powerstations.
WhenTerraPower,a companyfoundedby
BillGates,announcedthatitwouldbuilda
nuclearreactoratthesiteofa closingcoal
plant in Wyoming, Ms Granholm, the
state’sRepublicangovernoranditssenior
senatorwere inattendance. The federal
governmentisalsosubsidisingtheproject
tothetuneof$80m.
Butnuclearpowerstillfacesseveralob
stacles.Expertssaythebiggestisthepro
hibitivecostofbuildinga newplant.New
designs,suchasTerraPower’s,mayhelp
withthis.Manystates,includingCalifor
nia,alsohavedefactobansonbuilding
newreactorsuntilradioactivewastecanbe
permanentlydisposedof.Thefederalgov
ernmenttriedfordecadestobuilda nuc
learwasterepositoryatYuccaMountainin
southernNevada,butmetstiffresistance
fromlocalpoliticianswhodidn’twantthe
stuffburiedintheirbackyard.
ThefirstofDiablo’sreactorswillloseits
licencein2024.Thereport’sauthorshope
theGoldenStatewillcometoitssensesbe
fore then. “The circumstances have
changed,” says Ejeong BaikofStanford.
“DiabloCanyonpresentsanopportunity,”
sheadds.WillCaliforniatakeit?n
Power hungry
California, in-state electricity generation
By power source, % of total
Source:California Energy Commission
100
80
60
40
20
0
2019181716152014
Nuclear Hydro Wind Solar Other
Natural gas
Nuclear nipples nixed